00:01:55hooway quits [Client Quit]
00:23:47<Sylirana>Speaking of Starlink, I've received an email about being able to order it... Unforunately, I am not able to afford it. :( Would've been a nice change from 5-10 MBit/s down and 0.5-1 MBit/s up...
01:10:05Sylirana quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
01:10:57Sylirana (Sylirana) joins
01:14:16Sylirana quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:15:02Sylirana (Sylirana) joins
02:12:21Mineroboter_ joins
02:13:26<atphoenix>$100/month, right?
02:13:34Mineroboter quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
02:15:35<atphoenix>that's what I recall at least. Which puts it at a premium price point. $50-60 is a more common price point for standard (not top tier) broadband service.
02:16:30<atphoenix>but for the markets that Starlink is targeting, the speeds they are offering probably make them the only game in town
02:26:30Wayward quits [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
02:31:31<Craigle>Yep, $100/month and $500 to purchase the hardware up front. ($100 to reserve your spot in the "beta" which they said is fully refundable if you drop out, and credits toward the $500)
02:33:07<Craigle>I honestly almost pulled the trigger, but it would be lower speed than what I have now, and even though they don't have data caps, my household uses TB's per month, so I felt like I was going to end up having "a conversation" sooner rather than later about data usage
02:42:36flashfire42 quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
02:42:43@kiska quits [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
02:42:43s-crypt quits [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
03:05:23s-crypt (s-crypt) joins
03:05:33flashfire42 (flashfire42) joins
03:06:57kiska (kiska) joins
03:06:57@ChanServ sets mode: +o kiska
03:07:27DogsRNice quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
03:11:30Mineroboter joins
03:13:22Mineroboter_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
03:22:52<Sylirana>Those 5-10 MBit/s down and 0.5-1 MBit/s up are about 50$ per month here. So I would most likely get a much better value for money, even with paying about double the price, but currently eating emergency rations, so anything that adds costs, is pretty much out of question currently.
03:26:16<Sylirana>Around here, the hardware costs slightly more (around 512 USD when converted), the monthly costs and the one to reserve the spot are still at around 100 USD though. Shipping and handling is about 66 USD (and they say that taxes and other costs could be added on top of that by customs).
04:16:01qw3rty__ joins
04:19:40qw3rty_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
04:37:54minus quits [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
04:45:50minus joins
05:03:26dxrt_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
05:23:44lennier2 joins
05:27:06lennier1 quits [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
05:27:11lennier2 is now known as lennier1
05:43:27<atphoenix>so Twitter has a reply hider option https://techcrunch.com/2019/11/21/twitter-rolls-out-its-hide-replies-feature-to-all-users-worldwide/
05:43:53<atphoenix>is that what is going on here with the parent tweet? This is the reply tweet https://twitter.com/4z07h0z/status/1369504852758306824
05:44:09<atphoenix>parent tweet is https://twitter.com/KatsanosAlex/status/1369501497348812801
05:44:52<atphoenix>when looking at the child tweet, you can see that the parent appears to have 7 replies. But when looking at the parent, none show up.
05:45:19<atphoenix>but some did show up previously as seen in http://web.archive.org/web/20210310060651/https://twitter.com/KatsanosAlex/status/1369501497348812801
05:45:26<Jake>I don't think that feature is being used, I think twitter is hiding some tweets for unknown reasons
05:47:34<atphoenix>my usual experience is I can see the replies by going to a specific tweet, but that isn't happening here. And this isn't like a hot controversial sensitive topic either. (okay, fire is hot and SBG2 burned and all that, but that isn't my point)
05:49:11<atphoenix>can you see any replies? Maybe it is just me?
05:49:30<Jake>nope. I can't. I've seen this on other tweets that weren't even remotely controversial as well.
05:53:01<atphoenix>my Twitter disappointment gauge just moved up a notch
05:54:31<Jake>far as I can tell, some just disappear from being a "reply" at some magical point which isn't made very obvious to the user
06:50:52Lord_Nightmare quits [Remote host closed the connection]
06:54:48Lord_Nightmare (Lord_Nightmare) joins
07:01:33hooway joins
07:05:19rsn_ quits [Quit: Leaving]
07:56:38LeGoupil joins
08:00:33britmob25 quits [Quit: britmob25]
08:13:07BlueMaxima quits [Client Quit]
08:18:19Arcorann__ joins
08:19:53Arcorann (Arcorann) joins
08:20:23Arcorann_ joins
08:23:38Arcorann__ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
08:24:30Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
08:49:08Arcorann__ joins
08:52:14Arcorann_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
08:56:58dxrt joins
08:57:01dxrt quits [Changing host]
08:57:01dxrt (dxrt) joins
08:57:01@ChanServ sets mode: +o dxrt
09:20:02HP_Archivist quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
09:55:04Arcorann__ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
10:03:43Arcorann (Arcorann) joins
10:19:30Arcorann_ joins
10:23:30Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 264 seconds]
10:37:27sliccricc_ quits [Remote host closed the connection]
10:37:52sliccricc_ (sliccricc) joins
13:19:15britmob25 joins
14:08:43LeGoupil quits [Client Quit]
14:53:38Arcorann_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
15:17:25marked195734 quits [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
15:18:25sliccricc_ quits [Remote host closed the connection]
15:18:29britmob quits [Remote host closed the connection]
15:18:36s-crypt quits [Client Quit]
15:18:51britmob joins
15:19:01s-crypt (s-crypt) joins
15:57:01rsn joins
16:49:33spirit joins
17:17:33mutantmonkey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
17:17:49mutantmonkey (mutantmonkey) joins
18:05:19DogsRNice (Webuser299) joins
19:02:19mutantmonkey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
19:02:36mutantmonkey (mutantmonkey) joins
19:08:25rsn quits [Client Quit]
19:41:42rsn joins
21:47:28Arcorann_ joins
22:00:54Arcorann_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds]
22:02:29spirit quits [Client Quit]
22:56:50BlueMaxima joins