00:04:04 | | angenieux quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
00:06:40 | | angenieux (angenieux) joins |
02:31:02 | | sec^nd quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
02:31:18 | | thenes quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
02:31:22 | | sec^nd (second) joins |
02:31:37 | | thenes (thenes) joins |
03:06:04 | | utulien quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
04:09:58 | | @rewby quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
05:44:33 | | rewby (rewby) joins |
05:44:33 | | @ChanServ sets mode: +o rewby |
09:15:42 | | @rewby quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
09:38:14 | | rewby (rewby) joins |
09:38:14 | | @ChanServ sets mode: +o rewby |
10:11:03 | | dave quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
10:24:11 | | dave (dave) joins |
10:41:29 | | T31M quits [Quit: ZNC - https://znc.in] |
10:43:19 | | T31M joins |
10:43:21 | | T31M is now authenticated as T31M |
11:27:35 | | Dallas quits [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)] |
12:00:04 | | Bleo18260072271962345 quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat] |
12:02:51 | | Bleo18260072271962345 joins |
12:21:08 | | dave quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
12:22:17 | | dave (dave) joins |
13:15:05 | | th3z0l4 quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
13:15:59 | | th3z0l4 joins |
13:20:38 | | saumon quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
13:34:12 | | saumon (saumon) joins |
14:00:37 | | sec^nd quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
14:00:40 | | thenes quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
14:02:55 | | thenes (thenes) joins |
14:03:10 | | sec^nd (second) joins |
17:06:44 | | angenieux quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
18:35:33 | | PredatorIWD25 quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
18:39:09 | | PredatorIWD25 joins |
19:28:22 | | tech234a quits [] |
19:41:44 | | nomead joins |
19:53:24 | | utulien joins |
20:04:58 | | BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
20:05:42 | | BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins |
20:12:10 | | nomead quits [Client Quit] |
20:18:57 | <BuildTheRobots> | evening all - is it possible to configure the Warrior to use a SOCKS proxy? |
20:20:01 | <@imer> | BuildTheRobots: No! See https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Running_Archive_Team_Projects_with_Docker#Can_I_use_whatever_internet_access_for_running_scripts? |
20:20:28 | <@imer> | (thats on the docker page but applies universally) |
20:21:32 | <BuildTheRobots> | thank you imer, i kept searching for socks or and failed to find it - let me have a read |
20:23:18 | <BuildTheRobots> | "No proxies. Proxies can return bad data. The original HTTP headers and IP address are needed for the WARC file." - ah, fair enough then... I've got a lot of compute/bandwidth available at home but only the one IP address, but have been offered the ability to route through a few friends to present as multiple IPs (which I thought would be better), but I can see why proxying it would be a problem |
20:24:55 | <TheTechRobo> | BuildTheRobots: In general, yes, more IPs are great, but unfortunately there is a lot of broken proxy software out there. |
21:01:51 | <BuildTheRobots> | yeah, that's fair. tbh, I have no idea what sshd's socks proxy would return in the event of a temporary network failure. The rules say no VPNs - I assume that means no VPN services rather than my own site-to-site links? |
21:38:42 | <TheTechRobo> | I'm not an admin, so take this with a grain of salt, but I think if you are using a self-hosted VPN with actual transport-layer tunneling (like Wireguard, OpenVPN, etc) it is *probably* fine. |
21:38:50 | <TheTechRobo> | Again, though, not an admin. :-) |
21:41:13 | <myself> | BuildTheRobots: In that case you should just ask those friends to run warriors |
21:42:15 | <BuildTheRobots> | that would be ideal, but a few of them are just an old raspberry pi sat somewhere with ssh - they really don't have the resource to run a warrior, but they can push ip packets |
21:42:49 | <BuildTheRobots> | @TheTechRobo noted - thank you :) |
23:19:01 | | BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
23:19:23 | | BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins |
23:55:53 | | Meli quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |