01:00:09tzt quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
01:54:16michaelblob_ (michaelblob) joins
01:57:45michaelblob quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
02:41:29tzt (tzt) joins
03:18:30michaelblob (michaelblob) joins
03:21:40michaelblob_ quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
03:25:52michaelblob_ (michaelblob) joins
03:29:40michaelblob quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
03:52:31Craigle quits [Client Quit]
03:54:09Craigle (Craigle) joins
04:12:56<Ryz>Unsure if I got an answer, but I'll repeat the question again: Question, is https://chute.rocks/ considered a URL shortener? Because as exampled on the website, something like https://chute.rocks/pQ84E954pkgj redirects to https://www.bitchute.com/video/pQ84E954pkgj
06:07:07IDK (IDK) joins
11:57:36Ryz quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
12:12:22Ryz (Ryz) joins
12:25:49TheTechRobo quits [Remote host closed the connection]
12:26:31TheTechRobo (TheTechRobo) joins
15:38:47<@kaz>yes
15:39:19<@kaz>https://irc.kurt.gg/uploads/9fdbde7e2c909cf4/image.png
15:40:54<@kaz>on the basis it serves a 302 (then bitchute serves a 301!) I'd say it counts (wrong ss above)
15:49:57<Ryz>kaz, a bit thrown off because it's just using the same video ID; URL shorteners have different codes or something like that; it's only a shortener in that https://chute.rocks/pQ84E954pkgj is shorter than https://www.bitchute.com/video/pQ84E954pkgj
15:50:07<Ryz>May need more opinions~
15:58:07<@JAA>Yes, it belongs in https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/URLTeam#%22Official%22_shorteners to be precise.
15:58:30<@JAA>Plenty there that just use an ID (either directly or encoded) in the shorter URLs.
15:58:36<@JAA>It's still a shortened URL.
15:59:20<@JAA>Whether they need to be archived is another question. They generally shouldn't be at risk while the corresponding site exists.
16:00:01<Ryz>Ah, I was also ask whether to archive the stuff as well for these specific kinds of URL shorteners
16:02:31<Ryz>I don't think it's an official URL shortener though, since https://chute.rocks/ was made by https://www.iceagefarmer.com/
16:12:24<@JAA>Hrm
16:12:50<@JAA>Yeah, not there then. It's still a shortener, but *very* low priority in my opinion.
16:13:10<@JAA>(Also pretty much useless while we don't produce WARC here since you can just generate the output then.)
16:13:38<@JAA>I assume it also doesn't check for the video's existence first but just blindly redirects.
17:41:40mutantm0nkey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
17:42:01mutantm0nkey (mutantmonkey) joins
18:30:49mutantm0nkey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
18:31:14mutantm0nkey (mutantmonkey) joins
18:31:48Ryz quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
18:36:53Ryz (Ryz) joins
18:42:48mutantm0nkey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
18:45:04mutantm0nkey (mutantmonkey) joins
19:09:05driib quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat]
19:10:01driib (driib) joins
19:33:16mutantm0nkey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
19:45:20ben1 quits [Quit: i'll probably be back soon]
19:46:18ben (ben) joins
20:02:19mutantm0nkey (mutantmonkey) joins
22:08:24michaelblob (michaelblob) joins
22:11:51michaelblob_ quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
22:46:55michaelblob_ (michaelblob) joins
22:51:00michaelblob quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]