01:10:11rewby quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
01:28:55AlsoHP_Archivist joins
01:32:11HP_Archivist quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
02:13:57rewby (rewby) joins
04:03:16Barto quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
04:36:11<nicolas17>JAA: does archive.org support multi-part uploads?
04:37:22<nicolas17>I'm getting awful speeds uploading 1 file
04:37:31<nicolas17>uploading 2 files I don't seem to get a further slowdown
04:38:20<nicolas17>so it seems if I could upload 10 files at once it would be good for throughput... but I can't fit 10 files in my VPS at once :P
04:39:25<@JAA>nicolas17: Yes, but the processing after completion is very slow.
04:39:44<@JAA>ia-upload-stream in my little-things repo implements it.
04:40:02<@JAA>As the name suggests, originally written to upload a stream of data rather than a file from disk.
04:41:40<@JAA>Which means it buffers in memory, of course.
04:41:55<nicolas17>I have even less RAM than disk
04:41:56<nicolas17>:D
04:42:17<@JAA>Who doesn't? :-P
04:42:22<nicolas17>I mean like
04:42:29<nicolas17>these are 7GB files
04:42:41<nicolas17>my VPS has a total of 25GB SSD and 1GB RAM
04:42:47<@JAA>Ah
04:42:49<@JAA>Welp
04:42:54<fireonlive>f
04:43:46<nicolas17>uploading from VPS I get 1MiB/s, uploading from home I get like 6s/MiB
04:44:23<@JAA>Upload from home but route your traffic through the VPS?
04:44:58<JTL>so that isn't a typo of 6MiB/s?
04:45:01<@JAA>Can be as simple as a SOCKS proxy with `ssh -D`.
04:45:09<JTL>I concur that low specs like that would be an issue
04:45:28<@JAA>JTL: 6s/MiB is totally realistic for IA uploads, sadly.
04:45:35<nicolas17>JTL: no, the internetarchive python module uses tqdm for the progress bar, which switches to "seconds per megabyte" when it goes below 1.0
04:45:41<JTL>ahh
04:45:43<JTL>welp
04:45:46<nicolas17>instead of KiB/s
04:45:55<@JAA>mebibyte*
04:45:57<JTL>yeah....
04:46:18<JTL>If you have a "better" system locally I'd start by futzing with SOCKS and other proxy things
04:46:55<nicolas17>well, locally I have a lot of storage and a lot of RAM but the maximum upload speed I can possibly get is 3MiB/s, so that's still suboptimal :)
04:47:07<nicolas17>would be better than the current 6s/MiB but...
04:47:41<nicolas17><nicolas17> someone should give me ssh to their well-connected-to-IA server >.>
04:49:35<@JAA>Do you have the data locally anyway?
04:50:19<nicolas17>no, I can get it from login-walled developer.apple.com
04:50:28<@JAA>Ah, right.
04:50:52<nicolas17>would digitalocean in SFO be any better than digitalocean in NYC?
04:51:10<nicolas17>I don't know what's the bottleneck here
04:51:38Barto (Barto) joins
04:51:57<@JAA>Very possible. Network proximity seems to be a very significant factor.
05:11:14<nicolas17>yesss this is much better
05:11:47<nicolas17>of course when I get 200Mbps I wish for 1Gbps but
05:16:29<fireonlive>"now I want more >:("
05:16:49<fireonlive>i feel ya
05:17:50<@JAA>https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/791/790/48d.png
05:29:47<nicolas17>peaks of 80MiB/s, I'm gonna cry of joy
05:41:33nicolas17 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
05:56:54nicolas17 joins
06:35:11datechnoman quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat]
06:36:17datechnoman (datechnoman) joins
08:55:22<nicolas17>finished uploading, that was over 200GB
09:17:15nicolas17 quits [Client Quit]
12:36:52sonick quits [Client Quit]
14:35:11AlsoHP_Archivist quits [Client Quit]
14:35:32HP_Archivist (HP_Archivist) joins
14:39:50spirit quits [Quit: Leaving]
19:01:37nicolas17 joins
19:57:47HP_Archivist quits [Client Quit]
23:37:41wessel1512 quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
23:59:29Iki1 quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
23:59:47Justin[home] joins
23:59:50Iki1 joins