02:21:30sonick quits [Client Quit]
03:46:02Stiletto quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
03:46:14Stiletto joins
04:26:21qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins
07:08:26Stiletto quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
07:25:06Stiletto joins
09:01:52sonick (sonick) joins
12:55:58Sluggs quits [Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com)]
13:02:46Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
13:53:46sonick quits [Client Quit]
14:41:12sonick (sonick) joins
16:39:27Sluggs joins
18:57:41Wayward quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
18:58:49sallysue joins
18:59:06protondonor joins
19:00:31<sallysue>hello!
19:01:00<sallysue>i want to archive a large amount of webpages to the wayback machine, and i was wondering if there was a faster way than submitting individual pages
19:01:27<sallysue>my current strategy is to use the waybackpy library to iterate through lists of URLs and save them one by one
19:01:33<britmob|m>Is it a whole site? Or just a large collection of links from various sites?
19:01:48<sallysue>both
19:02:38<sallysue>i can usually get up to roughly five simultaneous threads running, but i am not sure what the actual rate limit is
19:03:03<britmob|m>if it’s a whole site that has some time sensitivity, archiveteam can handle that with archivebot. as far as random various links that’s likely as quick as you can go
19:04:06<sallysue>that is somewhat unfortunate to hear
19:04:18<sallysue>perhaps i should spin up a few more servers to increase my bandwidth
19:04:55<@JAA>Yeah, the WBM is not really made for mass archival like that. It's already overloaded frequently as well.
19:06:05<sallysue>would it be better to capture WARC files locally and submit them to the internet archive separately from the wayback machine?
19:08:32<@JAA>Well, they wouldn't go into the Wayback Machine like that.
19:08:58<@JAA>Only data from trusted parties is accepted into the WBM index because anyone could falsify history otherwise.
19:09:03<sallysue>i understand
19:09:11<sallysue>the goal is just to preserve as many webpages as possible
19:14:40<@JAA>If it's something that's valuable, it might be best to archive it through ArchiveTeam so it does go into the WBM but isn't horribly inefficient.
19:15:08<sallysue>efficiency is a rather mild concern
19:15:12<sallysue>i just like to save things
19:15:35<@JAA>Random WARCs are better than nothing, but they will almost definitely never be looked at by anyone.
19:16:09<sallysue>it sounds like the best thing for me to do is to just keep running my scripts
19:16:14<sallysue>actually, i have another question
19:16:34<sallysue>when i submit pages to be saved through https://web.archive.org/save, there is an option to save outlinks
19:16:48<sallysue>can this be done for automated submissions as well?
19:45:50<@JAA>That's only available when you're logged in. waybackpy doesn't seem to support that at all.
19:50:15<@JAA>Also, waybackpy uses SPN, not the SPN2 API (which isn't publicly documented). I'm pretty sure it wouldn't save images, scripts, etc., just the actual URL you're feeding it.
19:50:33<@JAA>Unless that got changed in the SPN backend since.
19:55:07<sallysue>sounds like i need to do some experimentation with the SPN2 API
19:57:38<sallysue>would capturing POST data and swapping out the URL work?
20:06:43sallysue quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds]
20:52:22DogsRNice (Webuser299) joins
20:56:15xit78 quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
20:57:40qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Remote host closed the connection]
21:09:13sallysue joins
21:14:12qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins
21:26:39qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Remote host closed the connection]
22:33:34Arcorann (Arcorann) joins
23:44:18Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
23:46:55Arcorann (Arcorann) joins