02:46:00<instence_>I'm setting up slack in vmware, obviously for archiving. Would reiser be a better option than ext4?
02:47:00<instence_>due to smaller files, and number of files
02:50:00<chronomex>for large files it usually doesn't matter
02:50:00<chronomex>reiser tends to win at many teeny files
02:54:00<instence_>yea this is going to be for website archiving specifically, so I guess I will go with reiser
02:54:00<instence_>I wasn't aware ext3 had a files/folder limitation of 5,000 without htrees
02:55:00<instence_>Have been reading this overview guide, which is great:
02:55:00<instence_>http://www.serverfocus.org/reiserfs-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-zfs-vs-btrfs
02:55:00<chronomex>I usually build my boxes with jfs
02:55:00<chronomex>solid as a rock, not fancy performance but it's consistent
02:56:00<instence_>ah, cool, yea slack supports it
02:58:00<instence_>I used to do website archiving in windows, and for the past year or more a lot of the tasks on my plate have been non-recurssive in nature. Static targetted grabs.
02:58:00<instence_>However with windows wget being stuck on 1.11.4, without css parsing, I have to get something setup in linux to take advantage of newer wget builds
02:59:00<instence_>There have been "experimental" wget builds of newer versions but I don't trust them
03:00:00<instence_>I think I will test out reiser for now, and keep IBM's jfs in mind for a future test run
03:01:00<chronomex>jfs has never let me down
03:01:00<chronomex>reiser has weirded on me once, but I was not treating it nicely
03:01:00<chronomex>zfs totally fucked me over
03:02:00<chronomex>ext4 hasn't weirded on me but its performance isn't great
03:02:00<instence_>if I run into any issues with reiser, i will switch to jfs
03:03:00<instence_>what are some things to watch out for with reiser shitting the bed?
03:04:00<instence_>I'm basically going to be doing a process of archive a single site, tar it, pulling it down from FTP over local network to another box for link checking and post processing.
03:04:00<SketchCow>....kills your wife
03:04:00<instence_>lol
03:04:00<chronomex>I never had actual reportable shit with reiser
03:04:00<chronomex>it was just a bit tricky to manage
03:04:00<chronomex>iirc
03:04:00<chronomex>this was years ago and I was in high school
03:04:00<instence_>ah
03:22:00<Aranje>If you figure smaller files and large numbers of files, probably. Does it matter? not really.
03:22:00<Aranje>cause the latest 3.x's have data loss issues. issue boiled up in ext4 that hasn't been fixed yet
03:22:00<Aranje>literally. the issue is triggered when the ext4 journal isn't written out on reboot or something.
03:22:00<Aranje>not an issue if you don't reboot every 10 seconds
03:22:00<Aranje>though... what kernel?
03:22:00<Aranje>seems legit
03:22:00<Aranje>chronomex:) what issues did you have with zfs?
03:23:00<chronomex>zfs-fuse transmuted a large number of symlinks, but not all of them, into regular files with size 0 and permissions 0000
03:31:00<Aranje>I uh what
03:31:00<Aranje>yeah that sucks
03:31:00<Aranje>we use zfs on our fbsd servers
03:31:00<Aranje>cause it does something Sue likes
06:30:00<ersi>haha, website archiving from windows
06:43:00<Sue>use the native zfs module instead
06:43:00<Sue>it's much more stable
06:44:00<Sue>haven't checked it in a while, dedup w/ large pages and snapshots hopefully have been added
08:59:00<SmileyG>zfs on linux chronomex ?
08:59:00<SmileyG>Oh, zfs-fuse
09:48:00<Frigolit>SmileyG: there's a kernel patch for ZFS as well
09:48:00<SmileyG>Frigolit: I know.
09:48:00<SmileyG>I know the guy whos doing it :D
09:48:00<Frigolit>ah :3
09:48:00<SmileyG>Thats why I was asking, hes doing quite well tbh (I do love to rib him over it as he proper evangalises over ZFS)
09:48:00<Frigolit>hehe
09:49:00<SmileyG>He's in NY tho, he lost power on his ipad after the storm and hasn't yet reappeared. I'm pretty sure he's fine though
09:49:00<Frigolit>:|
09:49:00<Frigolit>yea let's hope so
09:49:00<SmileyG>I do wonder about americas infrastructure tho
09:50:00<SmileyG>Does seem so very fragile.
09:50:00<Frigolit>indeed
09:50:00<Frigolit>speaking of zfs though, i'm not sure i'd use in-kernel zfs either at this point, seems about as stable as america's infrastructure
09:51:00<Frigolit>for now i'd rather go for fbsd
09:51:00<Frigolit>could go for solaris but... no... NO!
09:59:00<SketchCow>Is this -bs?
09:59:00<Frigolit>it is not!
09:59:00Frigolit walks over there
10:00:00<SketchCow>I'll answer this one thing, though.
10:00:00<SketchCow>America's infrastructure: Not Fragile
10:00:00<SketchCow>The issue is:
10:00:00<SketchCow>America's Infrastructure - We're a huge-ass fucking country
10:00:00<SmileyG>Well yeah that too
10:00:00<Frigolit>true
10:01:00<SmileyG>I think I suddenly realised what happens
10:01:00<SmileyG>due to being a realtively young country.
10:02:00<SmileyG>Do you ever demolish stuff over there? Like "en mass" ?
10:02:00<Frigolit>less OT, anyone knows how well btrfs works? i'm trying to figure out the best setup for a future fileserver
10:02:00SmileyG goes to -bs
20:05:00<SketchCow>---------------------------------------------
20:05:00<SketchCow>So, we're looking at doing an Archive Team Kickstarter
20:06:00<SketchCow>Would love suggestions for rewards
20:06:00<SketchCow>---------------------------------------------
20:06:00<mistym>Ooh. I need to try to think of smth
20:15:00<deathy>what's the goal of the kickstarter?
20:15:00<deathy>also..
20:15:00<deathy>Jason's hat
20:15:00<deathy>hat that looks like Jason's hat
20:16:00<deathy>old HDDs used for important projects (like WOW server auction :) )
20:18:00<mistym>That's a good idea.
20:18:00<mistym>Some high reward tier should be the obligatory "archive team dinner" with SketchCow, etc.
20:29:00<DFJustin>http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Kickstarter_Prizes
20:54:00<SketchCow>Thanks for reminding me of that, DF
21:05:00<flaushy>SketchCow: pins :)
21:06:00<soultcer>Will this be a real kickstarter at kickstarter.com?
21:06:00<flaushy>is the logo from the wiki the "official" archiveteam logo?
21:08:00<alard>Expert archiving by the Archive Team of a website of your choice?
21:11:00<mistym>flaushy: It ought to be.
21:11:00<mistym>I'd stick a high-res poster of that on my office wall.
21:13:00<mistym>Though I'd probably be forced to cover up the right-hand corner with another poster or smth
22:03:00<Dark_Star>I don't get it. Kickstarter? what for?
22:21:00<Coderjoe>Dark_Star: we put a lot of stuff up on archive.org, and they don't run on happy thoughts and fairy dust.
22:44:00<SketchCow>This willbe a real kickstarter.
22:53:00<soultcer>Nice
22:57:00<bsmith094>SketchCow: what is that pic on twitter?
22:57:00<bsmith094>http://t.co/z0c62yMF
23:19:00<SketchCow>My editing box.
23:19:00<SketchCow>The one I'm on now (although all my IRC is through a different server)