00:07:26 | | etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins |
00:17:03 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
00:26:43 | | etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit] |
00:27:48 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
00:58:13 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
01:10:59 | | etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins |
02:33:43 | <nicolas17> | inb4 upwork engineer wrote that code with an LLM |
02:51:01 | | PredatorIWD2 joins |
02:57:03 | <ymgve_> | but really, all cloud providers should have a big "I would rather have prod crash than billing going over $x" |
03:14:38 | | pabs quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
04:18:53 | | Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
04:19:08 | <nulldata> | https://x.com/JosephPattonWx/status/1880432285910200589 |
04:19:08 | <eggdrop> | nitter: https://xcancel.com/JosephPattonWx/status/1880432285910200589 |
04:19:18 | <nulldata> | Corporate consolidation strikes again! |
04:19:21 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
04:23:44 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
04:26:30 | | SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
04:26:48 | | SootBector (SootBector) joins |
04:40:12 | | etnguyen03 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
04:45:54 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
04:51:28 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
04:59:16 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
04:59:52 | | DogsRNice quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
05:15:02 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
05:18:44 | | ymgve_ quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
05:21:22 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
05:30:42 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
05:39:18 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
05:44:27 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
05:49:48 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
06:13:03 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
06:16:18 | | pabs (pabs) joins |
06:17:48 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
06:21:18 | | wickedplayer494 quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
06:21:39 | | wickedplayer494 joins |
06:22:02 | | wickedplayer494 is now authenticated as wickedplayer494 |
06:25:03 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
06:25:56 | | PredatorIWD2 quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
06:26:20 | | pabs quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
06:27:34 | | PredatorIWD2 joins |
06:29:24 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
06:31:25 | | SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
06:31:43 | | SootBector (SootBector) joins |
06:53:34 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
06:56:52 | | pabs (pabs) joins |
07:00:23 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
07:08:54 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
07:19:38 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
07:24:06 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
07:29:33 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
07:35:49 | | tek_dmn quits [Quit: ZNC - https://znc.in] |
07:36:28 | | ymgve joins |
07:38:32 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
07:44:08 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
07:53:09 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
08:06:02 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
08:06:31 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
09:04:01 | <joepie91|m> | ymgve_: that would threaten their business model though |
09:28:58 | | Meli (Meli) joins |
09:29:40 | | Meli quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
09:51:27 | <steering> | why on earth does Discourse think that I want to get regular emails forever telling me about new topics because I signed up to ask for help with something once? -.- |
10:01:45 | <joepie91|m> | that's an administrative setting, you can override it in your user settings |
10:17:54 | | midou joins |
10:33:42 | | Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
10:34:38 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
10:39:00 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
10:43:10 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
10:50:26 | | Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
10:50:33 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
10:51:39 | | tek_dmn (tek_dmn) joins |
11:22:19 | | Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
11:23:15 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
11:27:32 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
11:29:12 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
11:30:05 | | Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
11:31:00 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
11:31:13 | | pixel leaves [Disconnected: Replaced by new connection] |
11:31:19 | | pixel (pixel) joins |
11:35:43 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
11:45:20 | | MrMcNuggets (MrMcNuggets) joins |
11:47:30 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
11:51:48 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
11:52:15 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
11:57:53 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
12:00:01 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
12:00:06 | | Bleo18260072271962345 quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat] |
12:01:34 | | benjins3 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
12:01:52 | | benjins3 joins |
12:02:54 | | Bleo18260072271962345 joins |
12:09:33 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
12:13:24 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
12:26:53 | | Matthww quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
12:27:04 | | Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
12:27:11 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
12:43:47 | | Froxcey_ joins |
12:46:10 | | APOLLO03 joins |
12:46:13 | | APOLLO03 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
12:46:35 | | APOLLO03 joins |
12:46:42 | | APOLLO03 quits [Client Quit] |
12:48:03 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
13:06:34 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
13:28:52 | | chrismrtn quits [Quit: leaving] |
13:33:24 | | chrismrtn (chrismrtn) joins |
13:33:55 | | BouncerServ is now known as ` |
13:50:15 | | PredatorIWD2 quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
13:53:26 | | PredatorIWD2 joins |
14:07:58 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
14:14:22 | | Froxcey_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
15:26:17 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
16:03:56 | | MrMcNuggets quits [Quit: WeeChat 4.3.2] |
16:15:43 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
16:20:02 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
16:40:13 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
16:44:44 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
16:49:22 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
16:58:53 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
17:01:46 | | ymgve quits [Quit: Leaving] |
17:12:24 | <qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2> | https://www.404media.co/meta-is-blocking-links-to-decentralized-instagram-competitor-pixelfed/ |
17:19:21 | | Naruyoko joins |
17:25:00 | | ymgve joins |
17:28:54 | | sec^nd quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
17:28:54 | | BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
17:29:14 | | HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
17:29:19 | | sec^nd (second) joins |
17:29:28 | | BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins |
17:29:36 | | HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins |
17:34:32 | <szczot3k> | https://notes.ghed.in/posts/2025/bluesky-free-our-feeds-mastodon/ |
17:42:03 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
17:46:53 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
17:51:28 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
18:02:58 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
18:22:30 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
18:29:18 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
18:56:23 | | Meli (Meli) joins |
19:04:16 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
19:20:33 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
20:04:56 | | Meli quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
20:05:41 | | Meli (Meli) joins |
20:06:57 | | etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins |
20:24:13 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
20:31:15 | <nukke> | it is a little bit ironic that people are migrating away from twitter because it's a centralized service owned by a billionare and moving to... a pseudo-federated (but really, centralized) service owned by someone worth ~5bill |
20:31:31 | <szczot3k> | yup |
20:31:41 | <nukke> | disappointed by cory's article, tho :( |
20:31:52 | <szczot3k> | I don't like it that masto lost to bsky |
20:31:59 | <nukke> | I'm sure the mastodon foundation would appreciate 1mill, let alone 30mill |
20:32:16 | <joepie91|m> | I would not say that it has 'lost' by any metric that actually matters |
20:32:40 | <joepie91|m> | it has only 'lost' by metrics that benefit specifically the people who got us into this mess in the first place |
20:33:11 | <szczot3k> | joepie91|m it lost as in masto will still be the platform for IT-related nerds, mainstream migrated to bsky |
20:33:35 | <nukke> | https://fedidb.org/software/mastodon |
20:33:39 | <szczot3k> | I won't find my IRL friends on masto, the same way I'm not getting them to migrate to matrix any time soon |
20:33:59 | <joepie91|m> | genuine engagement on fedi is better than on bluesky, abuse is less prominent, communities are stronger and closer, and it is far more resilient to bad actors. the only metric that fedi 'loses' on, is "rapid acquisition of new users", which is a metric that only matters if you are a VC trying to monopolize a market long enough to cash out |
20:34:06 | <szczot3k> | Total users: 7,658,738 - some instagram accounts have more followers than that |
20:34:57 | <nukke> | as joepie91|m said, how much engagement do those accounts get from their 7m followers? |
20:35:25 | <nukke> | tho tbh the only popular mastodon posts I see in other social media platforms are almsot exclusively from infosec.exchange |
20:35:47 | <nukke> | most other servers are kinda in their own bubble if you're looking from an outside perspective |
20:35:54 | <szczot3k> | I like masto, but it will be an island of people from the IT field (and similiar). I'm not sharing cat memes with my best friend on mastodon |
20:36:09 | <joepie91|m> | szczot3k: honestly I think your expectations are unrealistic, and tainted by VC-backed platforms which optimize for maximum scale. your friends are going to be where you convince them to go, generally speaking, and the idea that you can just somehow *expect* them to magically all show up in one convenient place is a completely new phenomenon that was never going to be sustainable |
20:36:34 | <joepie91|m> | social contact has never worked that way and it cannot work that way because people have diverse interests and social circles |
20:36:47 | <szczot3k> | joepie91|m and I agree with that, but it's hard to get people to switch platform. My best friend won't get any relatable content on masto |
20:37:02 | <joepie91|m> | which is exactly why every "world-scale platform" invariably blows up into a hotbed of abuse |
20:37:28 | <joepie91|m> | szczot3k: of course it's hard. social contact is hard. maintaining relationships is hard. building communities is hard. this has always been hard |
20:37:42 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
20:37:54 | <joepie91|m> | that does not mean it is not worth doing |
20:39:32 | <joepie91|m> | the tradeoff is really very simple; either you put in the work to build your communities and you have control over what happens to them, or you outsource that work to a corporation and then you're subject to their whims. there is no third option |
20:39:56 | <szczot3k> | I'll get a friend to sign up on milliways.social, and then what? There's no people from, say, music, fashion, medicine. I can probably get her to follow some cat hashtags, and myself. and that's all |
20:40:26 | <joepie91|m> | and yet I regularly see posts about music, fashion, and medicine floating by on my federated feed |
20:40:40 | <szczot3k> | I can't even get relatable news from poland, except from maybe one or two security outlets |
20:41:21 | <nukke> | szczot3k: I'm confused. what is your point? what sort of engagement are you looking for? |
20:41:35 | <nukke> | these platforms depend on, for better or worse, organic growth |
20:41:58 | <nukke> | you're not gonna see e.g. a mastodon ad on the bus or train unless *YOU* buy spot |
20:42:38 | <nukke> | if *you* are not spreading cat memes on mastodon.pl or whatever large polish instance is, then nobody will |
20:43:00 | <nukke> | but you have to be realistic with your expections: you're not gonna get multiple (if any, really) replies right away |
20:43:18 | <szczot3k> | Just saying that bsky saw a massive influx of users, because "important accounts" moved there, and after that a lot of users jumped ship. Building any community around mastodon will be hard, because now it's viewed as "The IT folks playground" |
20:43:49 | <joepie91|m> | and yet people are constantly building community around fedi, including people who have nothing to do with IT |
20:43:52 | <nukke> | yeah true, and I think that's cory doctorow's point: mastodon is for the boring nerds, and bluesky is the party place |
20:44:03 | <nukke> | but that's kinda... not the point of mastodon |
20:44:09 | <szczot3k> | And I hate that! |
20:44:33 | <nukke> | the situation could be worse. it could've gone the way of diaspora :P |
20:44:47 | <joepie91|m> | like. you mentioned the milliways instance. that is going to get you a lot of nerds, obviously, because that's a nerd instance |
20:44:47 | <nukke> | but mastodon is seeing (slow) growth |
20:44:56 | <joepie91|m> | the problem there is not 'fedi' or 'mastodon' |
20:44:56 | <szczot3k> | My friend won't jump ship before masto is 'relevant', and it won't get 'relevant' if my friend won't jump ship |
20:45:27 | <joepie91|m> | and what exactly does 'relevant' mean here? |
20:47:33 | <szczot3k> | Enough of people she follows on faceobok/insta/twitter, and she wants to keep following, jump ship |
20:48:02 | <szczot3k> | And I know that is a big ask :) |
20:48:43 | <joepie91|m> | okay, then you will forever be doomed to live in a corporate theme park that will screw you over with no notice, because that is the "outsource your community building to a corporation" option and the only way to meet that requirement instantly is through a monopoly-seeking VC platform |
20:49:09 | <joepie91|m> | that is not a fedi problem, that is an expectation management problem |
20:50:04 | <joepie91|m> | no community-operated platform can ever 'succeed' by this set of expectations, basically |
20:51:52 | <szczot3k> | I've (started to) jumped ship, and stopped using facebook/twitter/instagram, because I care about things, but I don't expect my IRL friends, who wants to look at her fav musician posts on her fav platform. Sure, I'll try to invite them, but it'll be the same as with matrix - I'm the only one in their circle who wants that |
20:52:28 | <szczot3k> | english isn't englishing today, disregard my stupid mistakes for now pls |
20:52:38 | <nicolas17> | nukke: "owned by someone worth ~5bill" who is that? |
20:52:57 | <joepie91|m> | what have you done to try and convince them to come over? |
20:53:03 | <nukke> | Jack Dorsey, nicolas17 |
20:53:21 | <nicolas17> | "Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey left Bluesky Social's board by May 2024" |
20:53:22 | <nicolas17> | is he still "owner" in any meaningful sense? |
20:54:22 | <szczot3k> | joepie91|m the only thing I really can, which is "Come one, it's fun, I'm there". In matrix's case - they don't care about encryption, federation, data privacy (~that much~), they don't have any communities in common. |
20:54:51 | <joepie91|m> | szczot3k: that is absolutely not "the only thing you really can", and if that is what you have done, then I am not surprised that nobody has come over |
20:55:24 | <joepie91|m> | you mention that there's no music, fashion, medicine on fedi. I regularly see it float by. this suggests to me that you haven't made very much effort to help them find such people on feid |
20:55:26 | <joepie91|m> | fedi* |
20:56:01 | <joepie91|m> | so that would probably be a good place to start, helping them find a place that matches their interests, like a well-suited instance, and maybe some things to follow |
20:56:44 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
20:58:37 | <szczot3k> | joepie91|m I've joined fedi pretty much today, so I'm still learning, and I'll admit that I didn't put much effort. But in the matrix's case, I can't say that even putting this effort I'd find anything useful for them. Messenger (in our case, which is what I'd be fighting against) is what ~95% of conversations between our age group happen. Most |
20:58:37 | <szczot3k> | people also have telegram, whatsapp, instgram, and snapchat to name a few. Matrix would just be another one, where people can... find me. |
20:59:11 | <joepie91|m> | sure, Matrix is a different beast, with different solutions. but the one that came up here was fedi |
20:59:36 | <joepie91|m> | so that is the one I am commenting on |
21:00:30 | <joepie91|m> | the more fundamental point I am trying to make here is that you do actually need to put in the effort to make things like fedi work for you and your friends, community-run things do not magically spawn out of the aether, they are the result of a lot of people each doing their part in making it work |
21:00:39 | | ThetaDev quits [Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.] |
21:00:52 | <joepie91|m> | and this is a non-optional part of escaping the grip of tech companies |
21:01:33 | | Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
21:02:40 | | ThetaDev joins |
21:02:58 | <joepie91|m> | (more personally speaking, it's kind of depressing to me how people seem to have unlearned en masse how to collectively run community things) |
21:03:15 | <szczot3k> | Right, and it's hard. Even for me finding people in tech to follow, was hard on fedi |
21:05:55 | <nukke> | I will agree that matrix is ridiculously hard to navigate for the average user |
21:06:35 | <szczot3k> | I've used matrix as the example, because I was actually trying to get move some group chats on matrix |
21:06:37 | <nukke> | It's also an even bigger pain to administer |
21:07:28 | <szczot3k> | so far my homeserver wasn't that hard to administer |
21:10:19 | <joepie91|m> | well yeah, it is hard; see above, maintaining relationships has always been hard. in the past you would have to try out and join clubs until you found one that was right for you. you had to phone up people and plan to meet them somewhere to catch up. and so on |
21:10:35 | <joepie91|m> | that is just in the nature of maintaining relationships |
21:11:11 | <joepie91|m> | some things are just hard and you just have to accept that, learn to deal with it, and move on |
21:12:33 | <joepie91|m> | it's very easy to spend a lot of energy lamenting how hard it is to do something, more energy than it would cost to learn how to deal with it |
21:15:02 | <joepie91|m> | and I realize that I am probably sounding a little harsh here, but the convenience of world-scale social networks is a mirage with severe costs to everyone involved, closer to a slot machine than to a genuine means of social connection, and the only way to get out of that is to reject that expectation of faux convenience |
21:20:18 | <szczot3k> | joepie91|m sure, just want to emphasise that most of my friends are twenty-something. Most of us have had access to 'a social network' all of our life, and it's a big part of the connections we've made |
21:21:23 | | Meli quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds] |
21:22:50 | <joepie91|m> | szczot3k: sure. that just means you still need to learn how to build genuine community |
21:23:01 | <joepie91|m> | which is a crucial life skill |
21:23:26 | <nukke> | joepie91|m: as a counterpoint, you make it sound easier than it is |
21:23:39 | <joepie91|m> | you're just at a disadvantage for it |
21:23:52 | <joepie91|m> | nukke: I'm not sure how many more times I can say 'hard' :) |
21:23:56 | <nukke> | right. it's a time investment |
21:24:04 | <nukke> | and technical and skill investment |
21:24:09 | <szczot3k> | I just feel like we're talking about xkcd standard, but with a social network |
21:24:28 | <nukke> | as you egt older, resources (time, money, sanity) get more scarce |
21:24:40 | <pabs> | how many social networks died during your online lifetime? |
21:24:58 | | pabs . o O 0 ( MySpace ) |
21:25:01 | | etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit] |
21:25:05 | <szczot3k> | pabs that I've personally used? 1.5 |
21:25:11 | <joepie91|m> | szczot3k: the exact social network is kind of besides the point, this isn't even about fedi really, that just happens to be the easiest starting point for this right now |
21:25:29 | <pabs> | huh, that is pretty tiny. I feel like 10s of them are gone |
21:25:31 | <nukke> | hi5, xanga, livejournal, myspace, diaspora, digg (like 3 times), twitter |
21:25:45 | <joepie91|m> | but 'building community and relationships' is a generic skill that can be applied regardless of environment |
21:26:21 | <szczot3k> | Counting twitter 2.5 - nk (nasza klasa), myspace (the 0.5, I wasn't actually a member, but heard of it), twitter |
21:26:40 | <pabs> | nk is polish? |
21:26:50 | <szczot3k> | It was |
21:27:10 | <szczot3k> | https://nk.pl/ |
21:27:14 | | pabs reads https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasza-klasa.pl |
21:27:15 | <nukke> | joepie91|m: generic? no, not at all. how many irl, non-techie people that you personally know are on mastodon? |
21:28:08 | <joepie91|m> | I fail to see what that has to do with my comment |
21:28:43 | <@OrIdow6> | joepie91|m: I guess the way I read it is that you're kind of advocating for a like.... paleo diet with socialization, go back to the era of small forums or chatrooms or whatever, and the rest of us (or at least those in our 20s) have grown up with mcdonalds |
21:28:53 | <szczot3k> | The site was also popular in Norway, where it was the fifth most popular social networking website in 2009 > huh, the more you know |
21:29:02 | <nukke> | joepie91|m: it directly addresses szczot3k main complaint: how do you get the general population to join the fediverse? |
21:29:28 | <@OrIdow6> | It's hard, there are a ton of people on Bluesky nee Twitter who I've talked to once or twice and would like to see if I'm more compatible with |
21:29:58 | <joepie91|m> | nukke: slowly and deliberately. but that is a separate question from the point about learning how to build community *in general* |
21:30:15 | <nukke> | joepie91|m: you're not just "building a community," but you're also becoming your e.g. friend's IT guy for this specific thing |
21:30:44 | <joepie91|m> | yes, "helping your friends fit into a new environment" is typically part of building community |
21:30:53 | <nukke> | which client do you download? which server do you join? what's your useranme? @joepie91(at)whichserver? |
21:31:05 | <nukke> | my point is that it's not a 'generic' skill |
21:31:26 | <nukke> | it's time, patience and knowhow |
21:31:27 | <joepie91|m> | nukke: none of that is "the skill of community building" that I was talking about |
21:31:47 | <nukke> | what do you think is a 'community'? |
21:32:18 | <nukke> | if I or szczot3k want to build an online community with my irl community, ALL of these skills come into play |
21:32:23 | <nukke> | skills and resources |
21:32:51 | <nukke> | unless I'm misunderstanding what *your* interpretation of the word 'community' is, I think you're downplaying szczot3k's argument |
21:33:09 | <joepie91|m> | OrIdow6: yes and no. simply put, people who have grown up only ever knowing global-scale social networks are at a severe disadvantage socially, because that means they have only ever known a fundamentally unsustainable model that is at the point of exploding forever. your options to respond to that are to either a) belatedly learn how to do community and relationship management in a sustainable manner, but before things explode, or b) wait |
21:33:09 | <joepie91|m> | for things to explode and find yourself isolated and scrambling to recover |
21:33:18 | <joepie91|m> | this situation fucking sucks but it is nevertheless the situation we have |
21:34:05 | <joepie91|m> | global-scale social networks have briefly sort-of-appeared-to-work because people had not yet gotten wise to the issues, and tensions had not built up yet. that was a one-time margin for error that is not going to return. |
21:35:58 | <joepie91|m> | and yes, that is going to mean that that 'magical connectivity' is going to be lost. that is a fact, and is going to happen regardless of whether people learn how to build community in time, because this model could never actually work |
21:36:24 | <joepie91|m> | ie. it is sink or swim |
21:37:41 | <joepie91|m> | nukke: community building is about things like boundaries, setting expectations, organizing spaces *and the maintenance thereof*, distributing the work of upkeep and each doing one's part in that |
21:38:35 | <joepie91|m> | whether that community is an organized club around a shared interest, or a friend group, doesn't really matter beyond maybe "the amount of upkeep required and the shape of the boundaries and expectations" |
21:39:42 | <szczot3k> | having just one community on a given platform isn't enough to switch - I'm on IRC, matrix, messenger, just because the communities are there. My friends won't ditch facebook, because Zuckerberg is an alien, and also they've started fedi |
21:40:03 | <joepie91|m> | this means that community building includes "being willing to do the work of supporting your friends in their participation, and your friends being willing to do the same in return". exactly what that work is, is going to vary by context |
21:41:04 | <joepie91|m> | szczot3k: the whole notion of 'switching' (ie. there being one thing that everyone is reachable at) is in and of itself absurd and unsustainable, frankly. it's equivalent to expecting every single person to meet in the exact same physical venue at the same time |
21:41:31 | <joepie91|m> | genuine community can exist irrespective of the venue that hosts it |
21:42:54 | <nicolas17> | <szczot3k> I just feel like we're talking about xkcd standard, but with a social network |
21:42:56 | <@OrIdow6> | joepie91|m: So is there a benefit to eating natural food, before the apocalypse except to prepare for it, or if it doesn't happen within my lifetime? |
21:43:00 | <nicolas17> | szczot3k: https://xkcd.com/1810/ |
21:43:15 | <szczot3k> | nicolas17 of course there's xkcd for that :D |
21:43:18 | <@OrIdow6> | It's hard for me to imagine what a collapse would look like |
21:43:31 | <@OrIdow6> | I thought Twitter had a good chance of doing it but it just got recreated as Bluesky |
21:43:37 | <@OrIdow6> | And everyone on there moved there |
21:43:50 | <joepie91|m> | bluesky is already in the process of collapse |
21:43:57 | <szczot3k> | I'm also pissed at having to juggle 5 social platforms at once |
21:44:56 | <joepie91|m> | OrIdow6: re: "what a collapse would look like": mostly a complete lack of social stability, constant lost connections with people (some subset of them permanent), and an inability to speak freely with friends |
21:45:39 | <joepie91|m> | for an estimated timescale of "global-scale social media becoming completely unusable", think years rather than decades |
21:47:38 | | Doranwen quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
21:48:43 | | joepie91|m should go to bed soon, hospital procedure planned early tomorrow |
21:53:17 | | BlueMaxima joins |
21:53:37 | <@OrIdow6> | joepie91|m: Good luck |
21:54:12 | <@OrIdow6> | Don't have any articulate thoughts on this yet, maybe I'll have some tomorrow |
21:55:14 | | Doranwen (Doranwen) joins |
21:56:07 | <joepie91|m> | thanks |
21:56:14 | <joepie91|m> | (with a bit of luck I get to go back home tomorrow) |
21:57:23 | <@OrIdow6> | Oof talk about not being in your 20s |
21:57:43 | <joepie91|m> | 30s :) |
21:57:51 | <joepie91|m> | got a kidney transplant 4 days ago |
22:03:12 | <szczot3k> | I should treat my colon... but even thinking of it makes my anxiety go up |
22:07:04 | <@OrIdow6> | joepie91|m: Welp... ow, nice to hear it (apparently) worked tho |
22:09:04 | <joepie91|m> | oh yeah, it was a resounding success |
22:10:07 | <joepie91|m> | >90% kidney function now (used to have 10%), almost no side-effects from the (large quantities of) medication, all blood values looking good, and seemingly several days ahead of the optimistic recovery-from-surgery schedule, to the bafflement of medical staff |
22:10:33 | <joepie91|m> | textbook surgery on both the part of the donor and me |
22:10:45 | <joepie91|m> | basically, on all accounts, it appears to be a perfect transplant |
22:15:51 | | etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins |
22:41:48 | | beardicus quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
22:45:29 | | th3z0l4 joins |
22:58:28 | | holbrooke joins |
22:58:32 | | holbrooke quits [Client Quit] |
22:58:49 | | holbrooke joins |
23:01:40 | | etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit] |
23:06:59 | | beardicus (beardicus) joins |
23:38:45 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
23:39:14 | | Froxcey quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
23:39:14 | | Froxcey_ joins |
23:54:24 | | Froxcey (Froxcey) joins |
23:54:24 | | Froxcey_ quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |