HomeSearchPrevious dayNext day

00:13:55etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit]
00:25:17Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
00:26:12Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
00:30:53Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
00:35:33Juesto (Juest) joins
00:36:23etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
00:37:53Juest quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
00:37:53Juesto is now known as Juest
00:59:43Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
01:04:11Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
01:17:46Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
01:24:43Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
01:36:48Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
01:41:13Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
02:10:17HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:11:28Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
02:15:53Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
02:32:20Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
02:33:36Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:34:49DogsRNice quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
02:37:32DogsRNice joins
02:40:03sec^nd quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:46:15Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
03:04:06<nukke>holy shit
03:04:10BlueMaxima quits [Quit: Leaving]
03:04:11<nukke>nvidia just killed amd live on stage
03:12:10<@imer>did they name their gpus something else?
03:12:19<@imer>that'd be real funny
03:12:21Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
03:14:20Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
03:14:42<@imer>ah its probably https://x.com/needlessrelic16/status/1876464658510684337/photo/1 "5070 | 4090 performance 549$"
03:14:43<eggdrop>nitter: https://xcancel.com/needlessrelic16/status/1876464658510684337/photo/1
03:15:06<@imer>thats gotta be with upscaling though
03:15:07Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
03:18:39Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
03:21:01<nukke>yeah "4090 performance" can mean anyhting. gaming? AI? content creation?
03:21:07<nukke>16GB vs 24GB VRAM
03:21:53<nukke>then again, 4070 was basically a 3090 in terms of gaming perf, but worse in terms of AI due to memory limitations
03:22:28<nukke>assuming DLSS4 is 50x0 only, then yeah 5070 = 4090 is very likely
03:24:13sec^nd (second) joins
03:27:33<@imer>It'll be sick if it actually is - don't get me wrong I'm all for faster hardware, but given how these promises usually work out I'm sceptical :)
03:30:16<nukke>yeah the main thing is efficiency. even if it's 90% of the performance, as long as it's 40-50% of energy consumption, not bad!
03:31:57HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins
03:40:24etnguyen03 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
03:40:35Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
03:43:54Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
03:45:10Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
04:00:39Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
04:04:57Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
04:17:39DogsRNice quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
04:25:07UwU quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
04:25:33Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
04:25:47UwU joins
04:32:02HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection]
04:41:50HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins
04:44:48Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
04:47:11Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
05:59:00Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
06:04:07wickedplayer494 quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
06:10:41wickedplayer494 joins
06:15:51wickedplayer494 quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
06:19:43Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
06:21:55Meli (Meli) joins
06:22:53wickedplayer494 joins
06:29:51Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
06:34:14Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
06:34:31Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
06:35:36Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
06:42:57Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
06:58:27Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
07:02:47Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
07:03:31wickedplayer494 quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds]
07:03:50wickedplayer494 joins
07:15:34BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
07:16:11BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins
07:37:58Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
07:44:42Shjosan quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
07:46:10Shjosan (Shjosan) joins
07:55:42Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
07:57:56Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
08:15:33Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
08:23:23wickedplayer494 quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
08:24:44wickedplayer494 joins
08:27:32Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
08:28:57Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
08:35:12Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
08:39:36Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
08:55:00Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
08:59:33Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
10:38:53Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
10:39:34Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
10:39:42Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
11:37:00Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
11:46:18Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
12:00:01Bleo182600722719623 quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat]
12:02:50Bleo182600722719623 joins
12:36:48Hackerpcs quits [Quit: Hackerpcs]
12:41:54etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
12:52:10Hackerpcs (Hackerpcs) joins
13:02:06SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection]
13:02:29SootBector (SootBector) joins
13:22:57PredatorIWD2 quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
13:25:58PredatorIWD2 joins
13:43:58monoxane quits [Quit: estoy fuera]
13:48:02monoxane (monoxane) joins
13:56:14monoxane quits [Client Quit]
13:56:33monoxane (monoxane) joins
14:02:39Juesto (Juest) joins
14:05:48Juest quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
14:08:43Juesto quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
14:15:27etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit]
14:16:28Juest (Juest) joins
14:18:38etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
14:33:46HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection]
14:37:58HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins
14:49:16BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
14:49:17sec^nd quits [Remote host closed the connection]
14:49:43sec^nd (second) joins
14:51:51Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
15:58:58BornOn420_ (BornOn420) joins
15:59:07BornOn420_ quits [Client Quit]
15:59:28BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins
16:32:53BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
16:34:47qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2 quits [Quit: Leaving.]
17:48:51BornOn420_ (BornOn420) joins
18:03:40etnguyen03 quits [Quit: Konversation terminated!]
18:12:07etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
18:13:37steering is smart and good at irc
18:18:39HP_Archivist quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
18:18:48HP_Archivist (HP_Archivist) joins
18:28:27<FireFly>I never remember which is which of -bs and -ot tbh :p
18:29:29<@JAA>It'd be nice if there were a small piece of text you could attach to a channel, which would be displayed somewhere prominently in all IRC clients.
18:30:13<steering>prominent? who ever looks at the top of the window? ;)
18:30:15<FireFly>could even call it something like.. 'topic'
18:30:24<steering>tbh I should probably move the topic bar down by the statusbar actually
18:30:29<steering>tis not a bad idea
18:35:57T31M quits [Quit: ZNC - https://znc.in]
18:36:19T31M joins
18:37:09<kiska>JAA: Hetzner got sick of me calling them every 2 hours https://paste.kiska.pw/CongregatedGirosol
18:37:23<kiska>So I get a 2 week timeout from doing so... for the mean time
18:38:04<nicolas17>why, urls?
18:40:12<kiska>No clue...
18:44:16<kiska>But anyway, 2 weeks, then I am going to call them daily for 2 weeks. If that doesn't give me back my account, then the time between calls will halve
18:45:18<@JAA>1 week of daily calls. Half a week of two calls daily. A quarter of a week of four calls daily. Etc.
18:45:51<kiska>So my initial plans... daily calls for 2 weeks, then 12 hourly calls for a further 2 weeks, 6 hourly calls for about 2-3 weeks(depending on my schedule)
18:46:14<kiska>At some point I'll have their number on screen for me to call right back when I hang up
18:47:10<kiska>So yeah in my first phase I envision calling 10 times(business days)
18:47:40<kiska>ie 5 times per week, then 10 times per week, etc etc
18:48:55<nicolas17>Zeno's customer support call
18:49:22<kiska>They will not like me if I get to the stage of having multiple phone calls on
18:50:17<kiska>I guess if they terminate my account, I suppose I'll skip to calling them every minute
18:50:32murb (murb) joins
18:53:17<@JAA>The calls will continue until the account standing improves.
19:05:05<kiska>JAA: Correct
19:16:39BornOn420_ quits [Remote host closed the connection]
19:23:38BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins
19:41:35steering is now known as a_dog
19:48:39SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection]
20:14:32<a_dog>(from #ab) Tue@1222.22 < szczot3k|t> JAA: my connection to szczot3k broke, sorry for cutting out in the middle. Could you also please do https://abrnoc.com/? It's supposedly the same owner as Cloudzy.
20:14:48<szczot3k>a_dog?
20:14:50<a_dog>are there really two different Mohammad Reza working there?
20:14:58<a_dog>(their "team")
20:15:02<szczot3k>I dunno. The team looks fake
20:15:04<@JAA>https://www.reuters.com/technology/cloud-company-assisted-17-different-government-hacking-groups-us-researchers-2023-08-01/
20:15:21<a_dog>and also, hover over "Ali"'s photo (2nd row left side)
20:15:24<@JAA>The entire thing stinks.
20:15:42<katia>a_dog, posting about on topic on -ot?
20:15:49katia sets mode: +b a_dog!*@*
20:16:13<a_dog>is their team being fake really ontopic tho?
20:19:38<a_dog>JAA: that story seems kinda... ehh...
20:20:05<a_dog>shady host - yes, front for iran - no, probably not
20:20:34<szczot3k>Francisco claims he has good enough contract with them, so they don't either rugpull, or change the pricing/feature set
20:20:47qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2 (qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2) joins
20:20:47<katia>moving .lu is already a rugpull
20:21:06qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2 quits [Max SendQ exceeded]
20:21:23<szczot3k>He explained the .lu move pretty well, bad provider, no remote hands
20:21:35qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2 joins
20:22:06qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2 quits [Max SendQ exceeded]
20:22:19<szczot3k>He'd probably move lu either way
20:23:48qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2 (qwertyasdfuiopghjkl2) joins
21:08:01etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit]
21:16:13BlueMaxima joins
21:32:16SootBector (SootBector) joins
21:36:39Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
21:36:56Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
21:46:34etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
21:50:49Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
21:50:59Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
21:59:49Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
22:09:44Mateon2 joins
22:11:08Mateon1 quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
22:11:08Mateon2 is now known as Mateon1
22:41:24<nulldata>https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/07/us/las-vegas-cybertruck-explosion-livelsberger/index.html
22:41:39<nulldata>"Sheriff Kevin McMahill said at a Tuesday news conference the soldier, Matthew Livelsberger, started using Chat GPT to get information on how to conduct his plot."
22:42:13<nicolas17>https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6
22:42:24<nicolas17>"The findings revealed a significant negative correlation between frequent AI tool usage and critical thinking abilities, mediated by increased cognitive offloading."
22:52:55<szczot3k>isn't it a little too early to 'reaveal' something like that?
22:53:45<a_dog>causation, or correlation? ;)
22:55:24<@JAA>I could easily see it being both cause and effect. Proving that would be hard though. Showing correlation is easier.
22:58:28<a_dog>"mediated by increased cognitive offloading" seems to claim that it is causation
22:58:41<szczot3k>It really depends on the context. I was reading through x509 rfcs for a project at work, and asked chatgpt some really small, random question. Dod it have a significant nefative correlation between critical thinking abilities? Probably not, reading the spec was hard enough, the question could also be googled in the same time frame.
22:58:53<szczot3k>s/Dod/Did
23:00:14sec^nd quits [Remote host closed the connection]
23:00:31<szczot3k>Does it have a large effect while coding for example? Sure, asking it to create entire snippets of code might actually have a correlation
23:01:54<@OrIdow6>Is this just "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" again?
23:03:17<@JAA>Francisco commented on the Iran thing, by the way: https://lowendspirit.com/discussion/8949/for-immediate-release-buyvm-joins-cloudzy-ai#Comment_203599
23:05:01<@OrIdow6>Anyhow clearly before chatgpt a trained soldier would have no way of acquiring or using weapons and explosives in order to blow up a car famous for exploding and cause superficial damage to the immediate area. We must ban all non-straight porn immediately to counteract this threat
23:05:10<szczot3k>They're also active on Frantech discord t o any questions by the way
23:05:40<@JAA>lol, just now saw the title of the report those articles are based on: 'Cloudzy with a Chance of Ransomware'
23:06:17<szczot3k>In general the fact that "bad actors" are using servers which you can buy cheap, isn't surprising
23:06:28<szczot3k>Fran also takes crypto payments for example
23:06:46<@JAA>https://20688644.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/20688644/Website%20Collateral%20-%20Static/Halcyon_Cloudzy_C2P_Report.pdf
23:06:52<Flashfire42>https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gna! archiveteam gets a mention in russian wikipedia nice
23:10:19<szczot3k>There's not a lot to do when someone wants to run ransomware campaign from your network. Unless they're trying to register under "Russian Ransomware Campaign Ltd.", you don't have much to do before provisioning, and even after they're doing bad stuff on your infra, finding it out (assuming no abuse reports) in an age of TLS is hard
23:11:06<szczot3k>A server getting connection from a lot of IPs... is just a more popular webserver for example
23:12:24sec^nd (second) joins
23:12:44<szczot3k>Especially when you're paying with crypto
23:13:24<szczot3k>Even if not paying with crypto, what can you do before? Check if they're not on any sanctions list, and maybe if they're not using a stolen CC
23:18:48Meli quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
23:21:14eroc19906 quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat]
23:21:43eroc1990 (eroc1990) joins
23:25:35<a_dog>szczot3k:
23:25:39<a_dog>I mean, KYC
23:25:46<a_dog>plenty of providers require ID
23:25:52<a_dog>most require at least a CC or something
23:25:58<a_dog>that cuts down on it uhh... quite a bit
23:29:27<szczot3k>Not really
23:30:17<szczot3k>I give my ID to Frantech. They check that I’m not on any sanctions list, and my CC isn’t stolen
23:30:36<szczot3k>Now what?
23:31:28<szczot3k>Also in 2025 getting someone’s id and cc isn’t the hardest thing in the world. Especially in a state sponsored attack
23:34:28wickedplayer494 quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
23:35:09<a_dog>"now what" - the police come after you
23:35:24<a_dog>and yes, it could be stolen, that does happen. significantly less than just using a provider that accepts crypto.
23:35:47wickedplayer494 joins
23:38:27<a_dog>(and yes, some people are stupid enough to do actually-illegal stuff-against-companies under their own name as well, also significantly less often)

HomeSearchPrevious dayNext day