01:23:25nulldata (nulldata) joins
01:37:24<kpcyrd>steering: I'm not really worried about the quarantine feature being abused, the game theory for this is likely going to be reputation-based, e.g. only few people get this privilege and they have their image at stake
01:39:59<kpcyrd>I also don't understand how provenance is relevant for the ultralytics attack
01:40:12<@JAA>It isn't.
01:40:53<nicolas17>I think it's like "if we required signed software this wouldn't have happened!" "the malware was signed" "oh"
01:41:04<kpcyrd>I don't know enough about trusted publishers to say if it would've helped. I've heard the github actions cache was poisoned, which was why the follow up releases were also malicious.
01:41:32<@JAA>Yeah, turns out when the environment that's trusted is compromised, signatures don't mean anything. Who'd've thunk it?
01:41:48<kpcyrd>code signing is a failed attempt to aid over the fact there's no code review system in place (there, I said it)
01:42:01<@JAA>kpcyrd: Ultralytics people themselves have stated that it woudln't have helped. Here, at the very bottom: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/pull/18020
01:42:16<kpcyrd>it's like a code review system but the person doing the review also happens to be the author
01:44:34<kpcyrd>for do-not-track: last time this was tried it was still established consensus that "computer people do whatever they want anyways" aka "the pre-gdpr era"
01:44:41<anarcat>do-not-stab
01:45:07<nicolas17>https://www.5snb.club/posts/2023/do-not-stab/
01:45:18<kpcyrd>just make EU make it legaly binding pretty please
01:52:24etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
02:10:21<immibis>Ultralytics sounds like something that would make the world a better place if you got a virus when you installed it on your website
02:11:24<kpcyrd>computer ultras
02:15:21<@OrIdow6>Oh, of course it's a neural network
02:15:54<@OrIdow6>All the people pulling bitcoin scams have migrated there now, it's natural
02:16:00<@OrIdow6>for them to do stuff like this
02:23:42<immibis>did you see an AI spammer got on the front page of hacker news? and after that I saw a message on NANOG saying: you should probably reconsider being these guys' ISP or email provider
02:27:03<pabs>https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2024/dec/12/linux-banned-russian-contributors-do-i-need-to/
02:28:21<pabs>https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/70895.html
02:32:33sludgegunkman quits [Quit: Farewell!]
02:35:56<@OrIdow6>immibis: Like, they got their LLama copy-and-paste to get upvoted?
02:36:19<@OrIdow6>Or was it that thing a year ago where someone wrote something with ChatGPT
03:08:49<immibis>no they were just advertising their new startup that spams people with LLMs
03:09:11<immibis>Over email
03:11:52etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit]
03:19:40etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
03:35:24etnguyen03 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
03:47:04BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
03:47:46BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins
04:23:54<steering>so im staying at my dads house and... ugh his internet is so bad :( it's cable, but it feels like DSL
04:24:21<steering>if my daughter's watching something on her tablet (or the roku), i can't be watching something on my laptop without switching to cellular
04:25:14<steering>guess it's a good thing i have "unlimited" with 35GB FUP just so i can get data-only sims xD
04:35:46xarph quits [Remote host closed the connection]
04:44:45<steering>oh... actually, it probably is DSL, looks like it's AT&T
04:45:17<steering>8x1 :| https://www.speedtest.net/result/17127160681.png
04:49:30<@JAA>Impressive
04:53:12<@JAA>I think my best nearby chance of getting speeds that low would be moving to Germany.
04:56:10DogsRNice quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
04:56:16<myself>steering: do they have SQM configured on their router? https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat
05:02:14<@OrIdow6>Surprised you get that fast of speeds thru cellular, guess that's the benefit of living in a flat area
05:12:54<nulldata>I thought he said DSL? AT&T has Wireless, DSL, and Fiber depending on the area.
05:16:54<nulldata>But yeah - that's slower than what I can pull down from AT&T Wireless lol 29x7.45
05:18:25<nulldata>On a Verizon Wireless MVNO - 209x1.9
05:19:23le0n (le0n) joins
06:11:01Naruyoko quits [Quit: Leaving]
06:15:05Naruyoko joins
06:15:13sludge joins
06:15:28<steering>OrIdow6: that was DSL speed
06:15:41<steering>cell is significantly faster...
06:16:25<steering>35x13 right now (LTE, i dont think my modem supports 5G)
06:17:43<steering>200x1.5 (lol upload) on my phone
06:19:02<steering>(TMobile / Google Fi for both)
06:39:39parfait (kdqep) joins
07:29:27xarph joins
08:23:49sec^nd quits [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
08:39:43igloo22225 (igloo22225) joins
08:39:48parfait_ joins
08:43:57parfait quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
09:14:02LddPotato quits [Remote host closed the connection]
09:15:19nulldata quits [Quit: So long and thanks for all the fish!]
09:15:38LddPotato (LddPotato) joins
09:16:12nulldata (nulldata) joins
12:00:01Bleo182600722719623 quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat]
12:02:45Bleo182600722719623 joins
12:12:00Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
12:17:08<@OrIdow6>Apparently TVTropes stopped logged-out viewers from viewing history earlier this year as an "SEO optimization" https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15374859790A10773600&page=98#comment-2443
12:17:53ducky quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
12:34:49Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
13:00:45goos joins
13:01:24goos quits [Client Quit]
13:02:43dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
13:53:26dimkauzh quits [Remote host closed the connection]
14:06:25sec^nd (second) joins
14:07:56<immibis>why would you expect a site to track your viewing history for you
14:13:06<masterx244|m>immibis: it talks about article history aka previous versions
14:13:17<masterx244|m>that part got loginwalled in that change
14:36:37katocala quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
14:37:19katocala joins
14:59:37katocala quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
15:00:24katocala joins
15:04:17Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
15:05:02Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
15:09:29Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
15:31:42i_have_n0_idea9 (i_have_n0_idea) joins
15:51:48dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
15:57:05Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
16:05:47HP_Archivist quits [Quit: Leaving]
16:12:18dimkauzh quits [Remote host closed the connection]
16:17:36ducky (ducky) joins
16:43:03dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
16:43:49Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
16:47:36dimkauzh quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
16:50:14Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
16:55:07Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
17:00:11dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
17:09:07dimkauzh quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
17:11:00lukash984 joins
17:12:41dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
17:14:57lukash98 quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
17:14:57lukash984 is now known as lukash98
17:16:19Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
17:25:18dimkauzh quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
17:36:29dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
17:43:32dimkauzh quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
17:49:07dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
17:49:57monika quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
17:50:14monika (boom) joins
17:54:18dimkauzh quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
17:58:58Naruyoko5 joins
17:59:17Froxcey quits [Remote host closed the connection]
18:02:02Naruyoko quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
18:02:32dimkauzh (dimkauzh) joins
18:31:57dimkauzh quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
18:55:53Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
20:09:15<@JAA>Discogs did this as well several years ago, though I don't know what the reasoning there was.
20:47:20le0n_ (le0n) joins
20:49:45le0n quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
21:10:12ArchivalEfforts quits [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]
21:11:29ArchivalEfforts joins
21:27:15DogsRNice joins
21:27:18<@JAA>https://web.archive.org/web/20241213174136/https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/4000004/test/
21:27:28<@JAA>(404s now depending on your location)
21:31:19<@imer>nice
22:09:05Froxcey_ joins
22:12:27Froxcey quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
22:13:57Froxcey (Froxcey) joins
22:17:42Froxcey_ quits [Ping timeout: 260 seconds]
22:26:45etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins
23:50:31pixel leaves [Error from remote client]