00:05:49monoxane quits [Quit: estoy fuera]
00:08:19lunik1 quits [Quit: :x]
00:08:48lunik1 joins
00:15:22<Terbium>icedice: reddit has blocked many VPN ASNs in the past months and only increasing
00:16:33<icedice>Yeah, but never on old Reddit
00:16:39<icedice>That's what threw me off
00:16:48<icedice>I only ever use old Reddit
00:25:03<Terbium>they've blocked my on old reddit as well
01:17:36<nulldata>https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/streaming/twitch-bans-butt-streams/
01:18:21<@JAA>!tell HP_Archivist https://transfer.archivete.am/inline/BxU9C/harry-potter.png
01:18:21<eggdrop>[tell] ok, I'll tell HP_Archivist when they join next
01:27:52<nukke>icedice: try a different location. sweden is banned but not e.g. finland, norway
01:27:58<nukke>ymmv
01:29:24<nukke>holy shit nulldata photo... that's genuinely one of the most creative things I've seen lol.
01:29:24<icedice>Yeah, I know
01:29:30<icedice>It's based on the ASN
01:30:12<icedice>The hosting provider and ASN that's used for Sweden is used for a bunch of European locations
01:31:31<icedice>I hate the enshittification of Reddit
01:32:57SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection]
01:33:19SootBector (SootBector) joins
01:40:07<icedice>Seems like Reddit also covered np.reddit.com and pay.reddit.com
01:42:42<nukke>there was a pay.reddit.com one?! wtf 🀒
01:44:32<icedice>Yeah
01:44:53<icedice>I forgot what it was for exactly, but it had the old site layout
01:47:17<@JAA>I'd assume for 'gold' and all the nonsense other thingies they added later?
01:48:08<icedice>"It's an old subdomain used to have HTTPS, but now it's obsolete, yet it sometimes appears, maybe due to old traffic on Google"
01:48:19<nulldata>I believe pay.reddit.com was used for making Reddit Gold payments and it forced HTTPS. Back when a lot of websites didn't have or use HTTPS by default.
01:48:20<icedice>Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/help/comments/1734da0/what_is_payredditcom/
01:48:31<nukke>you had to PAY for HTTPS? wtf
01:48:56<@JAA>No, it was a separate domain for making payments securely when the rest of it wasn't using HTTPS.
01:48:59<@JAA>I think.
01:49:32<icedice>https://undelete.pullpush.io/ now says "Could not connect to Reddit
01:49:32<icedice>"
01:49:46<icedice>Worked fine a while ago
01:49:51<icedice>So I'm guessing this change also hit them
01:50:02<icedice>And PullPush in general
01:52:48<nicolas17>nulldata: man I wouldn't want to be in Twitch's side here
01:53:38<nicolas17>streamers keep pushing the line on purpose
01:53:58<nicolas17>but it's so difficult to try to codify where the line is
01:54:28<Ryz>Unsure if this is pointed out, but huh, from http://103.230.141.12/finished - https://transfer.archivete.am/u31zO/firefox_2024-03-27_18-51-01.png
01:54:29<eggdrop>inline (for browser viewing): https://transfer.archivete.am/inline/u31zO/firefox_2024-03-27_18-51-01.png
01:54:46<nicolas17>what about it
01:54:51<Ryz>What are the chances of that
01:55:05<nicolas17>the "remaining"?
01:55:14<Ryz>Yeah o.o;
01:56:35<fireonlive>Ryz: IP address instead of dns?
01:57:20<Ryz>It can be as https://archivebot.com/finished
01:58:11<nicolas17>why were you using the IP? :P
02:00:12<fireonlive>man i thought i was in #archivebot for a solid 4 mins
02:00:27<fireonlive>i was like it's unsually chatty
02:01:06<nicolas17>why does the #archivebot bot not use NOTICEs?
02:04:44<fireonlive>you'd have to ask `hannahwhy`: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/ArchiveBot/commit/8ce9860590ec30409939fbf7b61325964e1fe6bb
02:05:20<fireonlive>(first page: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/ArchiveBot/commits/master/?after=ad9703c489168bb88cd53b3f4ea3b6dadfe8820f+2204)
02:06:56<fireonlive>ooh hannahwhy why
02:07:32<Ryz>nicolas17, I more or less have it saved in my text files for quick deployment of links at the same time; I think it was before I realized there's a domain about it, but I guess kept it that way after all these years
02:07:54<Ryz>I guess on the off-chance that the named domain gets knocked down somehow
02:26:27<Ryz>Yep, the archivebot.com website wasn't accessible for a brief moment earlier, while the other one is still usable
03:05:19<fireonlive>oh weird, dns issues perhaps?
03:15:45<nulldata>Maybe your browser was trying https? The ArchiveBot site doesn't respond to 443 for some reason.
03:20:10<fireonlive>https://old.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1bouuv7/warning_vultr_a_major_cloud_provider_is_now/
03:20:36<fireonlive>can someone who's.... uh... clear headed lmk if this is just bs
03:20:58<fireonlive>>Vultr's new agreement requires its customers to fork over rights to our apps/software/data/anything hosted on the Vultr cloud platform. That goes way too far. No other datacenter company requires this.
03:23:40<fireonlive>people mad but it kinda looks like one of those like "facebook is allowed to transmit pictures on your behalf if you upload them to the service" penis covering things?
03:23:45<fireonlive>πŸ˜Άβ€πŸŒ«οΈ
03:23:53<nukke>there is no way this is legally enforceable. there was no notice of upcoming ToS changes afaik
03:24:17<nicolas17>fireonlive: no, this doesn't seem acceptable
03:24:19<nukke>that alone would make it uneforceable even outside of the EU/GDPR region
03:24:21<fireonlive>hmm
03:24:36<DigitalDragons>"for purposes of providing the Services to you" though
03:24:38<fireonlive>apparently signing in has you agree to it or something?
03:25:14<fireonlive>sad if bad, was going to get a few thing from there
03:25:23<nicolas17>if it was just like facebook's "we're allowed to prepare derivative works of your content (generate thumbnails of your photos to serve them to users)" then every hosting service would need the same
03:26:01<nicolas17>fireonlive: they can't force you to agree when signing in, because if you disagree, how do you turn your servers off and cancel your account?
03:26:16<fireonlive>ah yeah
03:26:42<nicolas17>looks like that's exactly what's happening to the OP
03:26:43<nukke>yeah there's usually a notice before they do major ToS changes like this
03:26:49<nicolas17>"I've been trying to get them to at least let me access my account without agreeing to the new TOS so I can migrate out to another provider, but I'm now on day 5 of being locked out with no end in sight"
03:27:07<fireonlive>:|
03:27:10<nukke>that way you can migrate data in case you/your legal team deems this change unacceptable
03:27:47<nukke>5 days is ridiculous, especially if e.g. they have (high) egress fees for large migrations
03:28:06<nicolas17>in that sense it doesn't even matter what the ToS change is or if it's enforceable etc
03:28:26<nicolas17>if they change the ToS and you disagree with it for whatever reason, *what do you do*?
03:28:54<immibis>It doesn't matter because what can you do about it? Sue them for $0.001 of AI content income? Sue them for your account after they've already deleted your data for nonpayment? Keep paying and sue them for a refund of $10?
03:29:15<immibis>The justice system doesn't actually deliver justice in most cases
03:29:30<fireonlive>Vultr--
03:29:31<eggdrop>[karma] 'Vultr' now has -1 karma!
03:29:35<immibis>nic said it first
03:29:49<fireonlive>'commercialize the User Content' woop
03:30:43<nicolas17>"Just upload a bunch of Nintendo IP and then have Nintendo sue the shit out of them since they now are responsible for it."
03:32:33<nulldata>Hmm later in the agreement https://www.vultr.com/legal/tos/#:~:text=(c)%20As%20between,under%20these%20Terms.
03:32:58<nulldata>> (c) As between You and Vultr, Vultr acknowledges that it claims no proprietary rights in or to Your Content. You hereby grant to Vultr a non-exclusive, worldwide and royalty-free license to copy, make derivative works, display, perform, use, broadcast and transmit on and via the Internet Your Content, solely for the benefit of You and to enable
03:32:58<nulldata>Vultr to perform its obligations under these Terms.
03:35:06<fireonlive>hm
03:35:17<nulldata>I wonder if the User Content section of the agreement was meant more for user generated content you submit to their site such as comments and support tickets.
03:35:51<nicolas17>well as I said there's two separate issues here
03:36:34<nicolas17>one is the nature of the new terms, the other is that they didn't give advance notice and a way to login without agreeing so you can move your shit out if you disagree
03:37:05<nicolas17>they are somewhat orthogonal and independently fucked up
03:37:47<nulldata>"Last Modified: January 8, 2024" - apparently it's been like this for awhile too?
03:38:00<DigitalDragons>idk this seems like pretty standard ass covering to me
03:38:21<fireonlive>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39847156 mentions a new CDN product
03:38:22<nicolas17>"Digital Ocean specifically limits this clause to uploads on their website (ie, for community articles, forum posts, etc), not for all hosted services (which would include virtual machines, databases, etc)"
03:38:32<fireonlive>via https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&query=vultr&sort=byDate&type=story
03:40:37<nulldata>The 'summary' they provide at the side doesn't really match what they're saying in the section
03:40:46<nulldata>https://lounge.nulldata.foo/uploads/b8a83ad3a66427d6/image.png
03:41:29<nulldata>"you grant us permission to use your content as necessary to provide you with the Services." when the wording the agreement is way more than what is necessary to provide services.
03:50:54<fireonlive>:|
03:51:04<fireonlive>wtf they up to
04:11:21pl4571k joins
04:12:46pl4571k quits [Client Quit]
04:56:56monoxane (monoxane) joins
04:57:10monoxane quits [Remote host closed the connection]
04:57:56monoxane (monoxane) joins
05:03:59HP_Archivist (HP_Archivist) joins
05:04:00<eggdrop>[tell] HP_Archivist: [2024-03-28T01:18:21Z] <JAA> https://transfer.archivete.am/inline/BxU9C/harry-potter.png
05:05:10<HP_Archivist>JAA RE: Potter Lmao
05:05:39<@JAA>:-)
05:14:35systwi quits [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
05:29:49BlueMaxima quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
05:55:51linuxgemini (linuxgemini) joins
06:10:05systwi (systwi) joins
06:10:18SootBector quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
06:12:13SootBector (SootBector) joins
07:23:39sec^nd quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
07:23:42SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection]
07:24:10sec^nd (second) joins
07:24:12SootBector (SootBector) joins
07:40:42Arcorann (Arcorann) joins
08:24:51sec^nd quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
08:26:39SootBector quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
08:28:21SootBector (SootBector) joins
08:29:16sec^nd (second) joins
09:00:04Bleo182600 quits [Client Quit]
09:01:25Bleo182600 joins
09:18:51sec^nd quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
09:18:51SootBector quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
09:19:30SootBector (SootBector) joins
09:19:34sec^nd (second) joins
09:26:59tbc18871 (tbc1887) joins
09:28:34tbc1887 quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
09:28:34tbc18871 is now known as tbc1887
09:52:25Barto quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
09:57:33pohyulin joins
09:57:46pohyulin quits [Client Quit]
10:03:16zhongfu quits [Quit: cya losers]
11:21:37Barto (Barto) joins
12:08:21SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection]
12:08:46SootBector (SootBector) joins
12:10:18SootBector quits [Remote host closed the connection]
12:10:38SootBector (SootBector) joins
13:37:16magmaus3 (magmaus3) joins
13:52:01Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
14:09:31HP_Archivist quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
15:06:15Guest85 joins
15:09:48Guest12 quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
15:10:09zhongfu (zhongfu) joins
17:43:27pixel leaves [Error from remote client]
17:43:28pixel (pixel) joins
17:57:53<nukke>neat https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/new-open-source-gpu-is-free-to-all-supports-modern-windows-software-stack-runs-on-an-fpga-with-custom-pcb
18:14:38decky joins
18:16:45decky_e quits [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
18:18:03icedice quits [Client Quit]
18:21:52icedice (icedice) joins
18:22:46BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins
18:24:48<nukke>https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sbf-in-jail/
18:25:39<nicolas17>nukke: I want to see Ben Eater's reaction to this :3
18:31:26<@JAA>Neat indeed!
18:40:23<katia>https://www.linuxfoundation.org/press/linux-foundation-launches-open-source-valkey-community redis is saved
18:40:32<katia>valkey was placeholderkv
18:41:47<@JAA>Nice :-)
18:53:50<nukke>Has anyone migrated to OpenTofu? Curious how that one is doing
18:57:10<katia>it works great nukke
18:58:43<nukke>Have they diverged from upstream yet?
19:01:18<katia>yes
19:18:11icedice quits [Client Quit]
19:18:50icedice (icedice) joins
19:20:51thalia quits [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity]
19:37:49zhongfu quits [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
19:42:26icedice quits [Client Quit]
19:46:19icedice (icedice) joins
20:42:22Barto quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
20:51:50Barto (Barto) joins
20:53:54<nyany>imer: gonna continue the discussion here as its kinda getting a bit off topic
20:53:59<nyany>if that's ok
20:54:34<imer>sure, i'm pretty done though haha
20:54:56<nyany>My most recent complaint with OVH is their billing - They for whatever benevolent reason decided that instead of paying $38.06 per month plus taxes for the SYS-1-SAT-32 server, I was paying their current price of $34.99
20:55:02<nyany>this was a few months back
20:55:28<nyany>A couple of days ago I got three invoices from them for no reason, turns out it's the difference between the 38.06 and 34.99
20:55:41<imer>lol
20:55:49<imer>they should just eat it at that point
20:55:58<nyany>they're going to, because they're on my ground now
20:56:07<nyany>(Canada)
21:17:23BlueMaxima joins
21:26:09<fireonlive>nyany: get 'em!!
21:37:58<imer>yes. ^
21:44:12f_ quits [Remote host closed the connection]
21:46:40<fireonlive>https://fosstodon.org/@drewdevault/112156829031615403
21:53:12<ymgve>"Are you compliant with the software licenses of your dependencies in any way whatsoever?"
21:55:43<fireonlive>:P
21:55:46<fireonlive><_<;
21:55:54<fireonlive>update on vultr: https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/2024/cloud-prodiver-vultr-has-bone-to-pick-after-reddit-post
21:58:37<steering>prodiver
21:58:57<Barto>fireonlive: i mean, it's MIT license. Sorry for the 9% who have to be learned the news the hard way
21:58:59<@JAA>The fourth one is a bit tricky, but yeah.
21:59:51<imer>Yeah, relicensing caught my tired brain off guard, but makes sense.
22:01:10<@JAA>The trickier part in my eyes is the 'claim to be the authoritative source for the software' bit.
22:02:32f_ (funderscore) joins
22:03:01<imer>thats fair, likely something one might need to go to court over to figure out case by case and depending on the wording..
22:03:26<@JAA>Yeah
22:04:12<imer>"no trademark" pushed that to "legally allowed" for me though, not a lawyer though and I probably wouldn't want the ensuing drama either way
22:04:49<imer>a dick move either wat
22:04:50<imer>y*
22:04:57<@JAA>A trademark would certainly push it to no, yeah. Without one, it's a lot murkier. Probably very dependent on jurisdiction.
22:05:06<@JAA>Oh, definitely
22:08:51<steering>i thought about that, but they're only claiming to be the authoritative source for the -improved software? *shrug*
22:09:34<@JAA>Hmm yeah, I read it as 'for the original'.
22:10:00<Barto>the more i see this corporate bullcrap, the more i like agpl
22:10:02<steering>mmh, IMO that's the difference between "bad taste" and "complete scum
22:10:07<@JAA>Otherwise mentioning it doesn't make too much sense, really?
22:10:18<@JAA>You'd always claim to be the authoritative source for your project.
22:10:59<steering>well... most people don't explicitly make that claim
22:12:39<steering>honestly I think my response if someone decided to fork something of mine, would be "oh great, i can stop maintaining it"
22:12:40<@JAA>Yeah, maybe not explicitly.
22:12:46<@JAA>Heh
22:13:16<@JAA>Barto: I assume you're familiar with marcan's rant about the AGPL?
22:13:25<katia>unless they remove the only reason you made that project in the first place in their Improvements
22:15:20<@JAA>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30044019
22:16:34<Barto>JAA: i actually am not
22:16:44<Barto>that's a damn wall of text
22:16:57<@JAA>Yeah, and there's a second wall of text in the replies.
22:17:24<Barto>was opening to read a bit of a comment, not tolstoi's entire work
22:17:27<@JAA>Don't take this as a 'that's how it is', by the way. I haven't made up my mind about the AGPL, but I found that rant quite interesting.
22:17:51<Barto>like you, IANAL :-)
22:17:59<@JAA>:-)
22:22:47<Barto>also, i can poke at marcan whenever i want, the dude is in archlinuxarm on libera, too ;-) Never talked to the guy though
22:29:04<steering>this umm... seems like a purposeful misinterpretation on the "pull request flow" bit
22:29:39<steering>you can download, change, and run it yourself all you want; you have access to your modified code and you are the only one interacting with it over the network
22:32:02<steering>ah, he addresses it in another responses... yeah... still don't buy that bit
22:32:16f_ quits [Remote host closed the connection]
22:32:33BearFortress quits [Client Quit]
22:35:37<fireonlive>Barto: you anal? ;)
22:36:07<Barto>:D
22:36:13<Barto>indeed
22:59:58<immibis>Barton: and SSPL is AGPL but even moreso, but also a bit crayony.
23:00:22programmerq quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
23:04:09HackMii quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
23:04:23<@JAA>Yeah, the SSPL is pretty ridiculous.
23:07:34HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins
23:14:40Arcorann (Arcorann) joins
23:25:48<fireonlive>:D
23:29:50<@JAA>https://www.vultr.com/news/A-Note-About-Vultrs-Terms-of-Service/
23:31:36<@rewby>Something I was wondering; how many of you have met fellow internet archivists (be it from archiveteam or otherwise) in real life?
23:34:23<nicolas17>JAA: good, but not addressing the ToS change issue
23:34:34<@JAA>They're simultaneously claiming that the paragraph was only relevant for forums et al. (but that wasn't what the legal text said as far as I could tell, even if that was the intent) and that the rights were only granted for providing the Services. So... which is it?
23:34:51<@JAA>Yeah, that too.
23:35:09<katia>rewby, i've met someone from this channel but not in a long time
23:35:59<fireonlive>arkiver has at least :p
23:59:14<nulldata>"How dare a customer call us out for having crappy broad language in our ToS after confirming with our support department the language was intended! They should know we only have good intentions! This is clearly a competitor jealous of our low GPU pricing."