| 00:00:50 | | dm4v quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
| 00:01:10 | | mutantmonkey quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 00:01:26 | | mutantmonkey (mutantmonkey) joins |
| 00:01:41 | | dm4v joins |
| 00:01:43 | | dm4v is now authenticated as dm4v |
| 00:01:43 | | dm4v quits [Changing host] |
| 00:01:43 | | dm4v (dm4v) joins |
| 00:02:34 | | jamesatjaminit quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 00:44:47 | | jamesatjaminit (jamesatjaminit) joins |
| 00:47:57 | | BlueMaxima joins |
| 01:03:15 | | dm4v quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 01:03:37 | | dm4v joins |
| 01:03:39 | | dm4v is now authenticated as dm4v |
| 01:03:39 | | dm4v quits [Changing host] |
| 01:03:39 | | dm4v (dm4v) joins |
| 01:07:17 | <kiska> | What a fun time https://www.reddit.com/r/CoronavirusDownunder/comments/p6gsms/nsw_633_new_local_and_1_overseas_cases_3_deaths/ |
| 01:07:26 | <kiska> | NSW going to be in lockdown for like the next 3 months |
| 01:09:38 | <@JAA> | Meanwhile, NZ had the first case since February and went into lockdown. |
| 01:10:08 | <nyany> | kiska: oof |
| 01:10:50 | <kiska> | Well... this is what you get with leaders that want business to remain open and trading |
| 01:10:59 | <kiska> | *cough*Conservative*cough* |
| 01:18:35 | <nyany> | stay safe kiska |
| 01:18:43 | <nyany> | the world is crazy |
| 01:18:48 | <kiska> | Its not like I am going out :D |
| 01:23:31 | <@JAA> | Oh yeah, NSW is about comparable in population to CH. We had over 3k new cases yesterday, but no measures are going to happen anytime soon. |
| 01:41:20 | | nertzy (nertzy) joins |
| 01:43:06 | | jamesatjaminit quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 01:49:00 | <Frogging101> | I think everyone wants business and trade to be open |
| 01:49:10 | <Frogging101> | it's sort of necessary |
| 01:56:23 | | nertzy quits [Client Quit] |
| 01:59:21 | | jamesatjaminit (jamesatjaminit) joins |
| 02:05:12 | | jamesatjaminit quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 02:20:57 | <Doranwen> | what I think is crazy is that people think you can actually stop covid from spreading, like have it die out - not when you have animal reservoirs! it's impossible to eradicate a virus that has animal reservoirs like that, and all the lockdowns in the world won't work, nor even vaccines, since they've admitted you can still get it and spread it and viral loads are the same whether you've been vaccinated or not |
| 02:21:07 | <Doranwen> | it's going to be around just like colds and flu |
| 02:21:31 | <Doranwen> | so we're better off learning how to live with it than trying to shut down the world in hopes of getting rid of it |
| 02:29:39 | | jamesatjaminit (jamesatjaminit) joins |
| 02:53:37 | <@OrIdow6> | Apropos of "spying agencies" and AT (#nevermind), it may be that some of us get on completely automated "lists", but other than that I suspect it's very useful to them |
| 02:54:16 | <@OrIdow6> | A while back there was some internal NSA document that got out through FOIA, sort of promoting use of the WBM |
| 02:56:08 | <@OrIdow6> | I became aware of all of this basically by doing intense web browsing - I presume that if you do research of that kind as a job, you're going to know what resources are available |
| 02:58:04 | | jamesatjaminit quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 02:59:15 | <@OrIdow6> | I do suspect that at some point a startup is going to find out that the data is public, call it a "dataset", and start using it for blackmailing people or whatever else is hip these days |
| 02:59:25 | <@OrIdow6> | Like Pushshift |
| 03:01:48 | | qw3rty_ joins |
| 03:02:14 | | jamesatjaminit (jamesatjaminit) joins |
| 03:05:11 | | qw3rty__ quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 03:21:06 | <Jake> | ( https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Untangling_the_Web.pdf page 275 for reference) |
| 03:59:49 | | qw3rty__ joins |
| 04:03:30 | | qw3rty_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 05:11:46 | | tzt quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 05:24:08 | | tzt joins |
| 05:26:13 | | tzt is now authenticated as tzt |
| 05:26:13 | | tzt quits [Changing host] |
| 05:26:13 | | tzt (tzt) joins |
| 05:57:57 | | BlueMaxima_ joins |
| 06:01:28 | | BlueMaxima quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] |
| 07:11:07 | | driib quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 08:00:09 | | britmob256 quits [Quit: britmob256] |
| 08:04:20 | | HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 08:04:41 | | HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins |
| 08:19:12 | | Earendil (Cobalt17) joins |
| 08:24:22 | | rsn_ joins |
| 08:26:32 | | rsn quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 08:31:59 | | Core2562 (Cobalt17) joins |
| 08:32:57 | | Core5044 (Cobalt17) joins |
| 08:32:57 | | Core2562 quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
| 08:33:47 | | Earendil quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 09:01:17 | | BlueMaxima_ quits [Client Quit] |
| 09:45:36 | | Core5044 quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 11:04:38 | | qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins |
| 11:08:22 | | HackMii quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 11:09:09 | | HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins |
| 11:50:37 | | nertzy (nertzy) joins |
| 12:04:16 | | britmob256 joins |
| 12:07:04 | | nertzy quits [Client Quit] |
| 12:10:58 | | sec^nd quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 12:11:23 | | sec^nd (second) joins |
| 12:29:40 | <@JAA> | That didn't take long... Second preimage attack on Apple's NeuralHash algorithm (which is used for the CSAM detection stuff that made headlines recently): https://github.com/AsuharietYgvar/AppleNeuralHash2ONNX/issues/1 |
| 12:34:25 | | qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 13:01:48 | | rsn joins |
| 13:02:58 | | rsn_ quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 13:43:18 | | qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins |
| 14:23:03 | | qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 14:24:02 | | qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins |
| 14:40:31 | <Frogging101> | JAA: wait, what? It's more than just a regular file hash? |
| 14:42:54 | <Frogging101> | "The main purpose of the hash is to ensure that identical and visually similar images result in the same hash, and images that are different from one another result in different hashes. For example, an image that has been slightly cropped or resized should be considered identical to its original and have the same hash" |
| 14:42:58 | <Frogging101> | ...I see |
| 14:43:10 | <Frogging101> | This sounds ripe for problems and false positives |
| 14:43:25 | | Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] |
| 14:47:15 | <spirit> | nah, that's actually a smart approach |
| 14:47:23 | <spirit> | else you can just flip a bit |
| 14:47:33 | <Frogging101> | well yes except then we have issues like what JAA linked |
| 14:47:34 | <spirit> | and images are all about perception |
| 14:47:48 | <Frogging101> | I'm not saying it's a dumb idea, I'm saying I'm skeptical about their ability to actually do it |
| 14:48:17 | <Frogging101> | Without screwing it up |
| 14:48:28 | <spirit> | there are things in life that work well when used as intended |
| 14:48:49 | <spirit> | and there are things that can be abused maliciously |
| 14:48:59 | <Frogging101> | I hope someone breaks this thing, collides it with a meme, and renders the system useless. It must be stopped |
| 14:49:16 | <spirit> | the intention of the algorithm is to find matches to known imagery |
| 14:49:20 | <spirit> | and for that it works well |
| 14:49:33 | <@JAA> | Except it doesn't as illustrated in that link. |
| 14:49:52 | <Iki> | Internal FBI facial recognition documents indicate the agency has historically accepted error rates up to 20%: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/facial-recognition-databases-hearing-congress-hammers-fbi-n737461 |
| 14:50:11 | <Iki> | "Internal FBI documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by the nonprofit Electronic Privacy Information Center indicate that the FBI's own database, called the Next Generation Identification Interstate Photo System, or NGI-IPS, had an acceptable margin of error of 20 percent — that is, a 1-in-5 chance of "recognizing" the wrong person." |
| 14:50:20 | <spirit> | the link illustrates an approach to maliciously generate data that will flag images |
| 14:50:32 | <spirit> | a completely different thing |
| 14:50:48 | <spirit> | (dont get me wrong, apple and all that are driving us to 1984) |
| 14:51:20 | <spirit> | facial recognition is something completely different |
| 14:55:06 | <spirit> | perceptual hashing is a fantastic approach to quickly search for known imagery in a set of images |
| 14:55:20 | <spirit> | running it on your own data without your consent or any legal reason is insane |
| 14:55:35 | <@JAA> | Well, true. We don't really know yet how well it works for detecting perceptually identical images. The comments on the script for the preimage attack suggest it shouldn't be too difficult to circumvent that. |
| 14:55:47 | <spirit> | this attack makes it possible for someone to inject data that will trigger a hashing match into your data |
| 14:56:05 | <@JAA> | Yeah |
| 14:56:09 | <spirit> | and then bad things can happen if no human looks at the actual data before you get lynched or something |
| 14:56:14 | <spirit> | that's all |
| 14:56:48 | <spirit> | i am not sure that hyping this is the right answer to the general issue of Apple's insanity, i think it is at least one level to technical already |
| 14:57:27 | <Frogging101> | Even if you've got humans looking at flagged cases, you've already got a crazy privacy breach |
| 14:59:22 | <spirit> | yeah! but not because of the algorithm but because of the general access to your device |
| 14:59:45 | <@JAA> | It does however potentially provide a way to actively combat the bullshit. If it can be turned into a first preimage attack, you could easily generate countless matching images and spam their system with noise. |
| 15:00:46 | <@JAA> | But yeah, I agree, it shouldn't exist in the first place. |
| 15:01:04 | <spirit> | "oh, we have to improve our algorithm" -> "develop better algorithm" -> "access to device gets normalized" :\ |
| 15:07:18 | <Frogging101> | A world where there is a perfect CSAM detecting algorithm might not be a bad one. But I don't trust them to stop there |
| 15:07:48 | <Frogging101> | Also it's a moot point because a perfect CSAM detecting algorithm is probably impossible |
| 15:08:01 | <Frogging101> | so any such algorithm in the real world will be flawed and therefore dangerous |
| 15:09:53 | <spirit> | It's not the algorithm that is dangerous, it's the people |
| 15:10:24 | <Frogging101> | well, yeah. guns don't kill people, etc. |
| 15:10:38 | <Frogging101> | the statement that it's dangerous is in the context of it being used by people |
| 15:11:51 | <spirit> | "We have access to the devices for preventing $evil1 already, can we use it for $evil2? And $evil3? Oh, and it would be nice to also use it for making sure we surveill the $frenchpeople properly" |
| 15:20:49 | | pabs quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] |
| 15:21:21 | | pabs (pabs) joins |
| 15:34:19 | | yarrow quits [Quit: Connection closed for inactivity] |
| 16:19:01 | | Matthww80 joins |
| 16:20:46 | | Matthww8 quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] |
| 16:20:46 | | Matthww80 is now known as Matthww8 |
| 16:25:43 | | wizards quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] |
| 16:27:25 | | wizards joins |
| 16:45:22 | | c00k13_ quits [Quit: bye~] |
| 16:46:09 | | c00k13 joins |
| 16:50:07 | | heart joins |
| 16:56:42 | | mrfooooo quits [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)] |
| 16:57:05 | | mrfooooo joins |
| 17:45:26 | | Larsenv quits [Quit: ZNC 1.8.2+deb1+focal2 - https://znc.in] |
| 17:47:14 | | luckcolors quits [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.] |
| 17:48:16 | | Larsenv (Larsenv) joins |
| 17:48:32 | | luckcolors (luckcolors) joins |
| 18:07:36 | | wizards_ joins |
| 18:10:40 | | wizards quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 18:31:03 | | Viniter69 quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 19:02:23 | | Viniter69 (Viniter) joins |
| 19:10:06 | | Ruthalas5 (Ruthalas) joins |
| 19:12:12 | | Ruthalas quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 19:12:12 | | Ruthalas5 is now known as Ruthalas |
| 19:16:00 | | qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 19:40:17 | | jamesp (jamesp) joins |
| 19:43:28 | <jamesp> | I wonder why you guys cancelled the Twitter Archive. I believe archiving Twitter is at least nearly as important as reddit. That's just my opinion. |
| 20:13:33 | | qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins |
| 20:18:43 | <heart> | I don't know the real reason why the Twitter archive was cancelled, but in my opinion Twitter would be a massive, MASSIVE effort. Better to wait until it's shutting down and they freeze the site. |
| 20:19:47 | <heart> | ~350 million active accounts, half a billion Tweets sent per day...yeah, nobody can reasonably keep up with that. Even the Library of Congress gave up on it. |
| 20:35:00 | <@JAA> | That project idea was from when Twitter announced they'd purge inactive accounts, i.e. large-scale content deletion. They halted those plans after Jason pointed out that they don't have a way to memorialise accounts of deceased people. Or rather, they delayed the account purge until such a way would be added. I haven't heard anything about it since. I imagine we'll do something when that is announced |
| 20:35:06 | <@JAA> | again. |
| 21:31:25 | <Frogging101> | They halted their plans because of something Jason said? |
| 21:31:56 | <Frogging101> | or just in temporal proximity to what he said |
| 21:37:17 | <@JAA> | Well, Jason tweeted about it, people started complaining, and they halted the plans. |
| 21:52:50 | <nyany> | something something social media doesn't like it when you try to archive their shit |
| 21:53:02 | <nyany> | which is sad but also understandable |
| 21:53:08 | <nyany> | anyways brb about to go brrrrrr |
| 21:55:47 | <@JAA> | Well no, they were angry at Twitter deleting dead loved ones' content. But obviously that has something to do with who follows Jason in the first place. |
| 22:07:13 | | Viniter69 quits [Client Quit] |
| 22:08:41 | | Viniter69 (Viniter) joins |
| 22:59:23 | <jamesp> | We could take a vote of should we continue it or not. I'll vote to continue. |
| 23:11:25 | <jamesp> | The names you pick for the projects are funny IMO. |
| 23:16:18 | <h3ndr1k> | I think it's not really the project names, it's mostly the channel names. On the tracker and on GitHub the projects have normal names. |
| 23:21:50 | <jamesp> | Well I like the IRC channel names. Anyway, can't wait to revive #twitterdead |
| 23:25:03 | <@JAA> | As I said, if Twitter ever changes their stance and reannounces the deletion, we'll look into it I guess. |
| 23:25:13 | <@JAA> | Until then, highly unlikely. |
| 23:26:35 | <jamesp> | Why don't we use the channel for ANY accounts we deem at risk? More like manually chosen accounts, like #youtubearchive |
| 23:26:59 | <@JAA> | Because that typically happens in #archivebot via socialbot. |
| 23:28:11 | | wizards_ is now known as wizards |
| 23:28:16 | <jamesp> | JAA I would like you to check out #stripminer |
| 23:28:35 | <@JAA> | I don't think I'm interested in that. |
| 23:35:50 | | Arcorann (Arcorann) joins |
| 23:54:39 | | @OrIdow6 quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |