| 00:02:45 | | BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 00:11:58 | | BornOn420 (BornOn420) joins |
| 00:15:16 | | BornOn420 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 00:23:11 | | unknownsrc4 (unknownsrc) joins |
| 00:25:29 | | unknownsrc quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
| 00:25:30 | | unknownsrc4 is now known as unknownsrc |
| 00:27:15 | | pepsi2024 quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] |
| 00:40:15 | | Wohlstand quits [Quit: Wohlstand] |
| 00:45:10 | | notarobot345 quits [Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat] |
| 00:45:21 | | Webuser681783 quits [Client Quit] |
| 00:47:25 | | notarobot345 joins |
| 00:47:29 | | etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins |
| 00:48:23 | | notarobot345 quits [Client Quit] |
| 00:49:00 | | notarobot345 joins |
| 01:34:48 | | DogsRNice quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
| 02:20:13 | | alexma233 joins |
| 02:28:31 | <alexma233> | @arkiver @JAA quick follow-up on my question from yesterday: for the Sina Video warrior, is it OK to route workers through my own WireGuard L3 gateway using SNAT to additional public IPv4s I control? No HTTP/SOCKS proxy or traffic modification involved. I mainly want to make sure this won't invalidate the archived data. |
| 02:40:10 | | etnguyen03 quits [Client Quit] |
| 02:41:37 | | Webuser398886 joins |
| 02:43:15 | | Webuser398886 quits [Client Quit] |
| 02:46:39 | | etnguyen03 (etnguyen03) joins |
| 02:52:27 | | lemuria quits [Ping timeout: 252 seconds] |
| 02:52:45 | | lemuria (lemuria) joins |
| 03:09:07 | | etnguyen03 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 03:23:21 | | mind_combatant (mind_combatant) joins |
| 03:23:45 | | alexma233 quits [Client Quit] |
| 04:32:07 | | lev (lev) joins |