HomeSearchPrevious dayNext day

00:16:09qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Client Quit]
00:18:00qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins
00:31:01qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
00:51:17qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins
01:54:31<systwi_>Foolish question; if I non-recursively grab a webpage with `grab-site`, with `wpull`'s --no-parent disabled, will that still grab other subpages on the source?
01:54:34<systwi_>E.g.:
01:54:54<systwi_>http://example.com/page/dogs.htm - source
01:56:02<systwi_>Could that theoretically follow: http://example.com/page/dogs.htm -> http://example.com/ -> http://example.com/bigfileshere/wtfisthis.tar
01:56:17<systwi_>Assuming http://example.com/ is the only one of those linked on http://example.com/page/dogs.htm .
01:56:39<systwi_>Or, it's probably none of that, considering the job is non-recursive.
02:03:40jjiminez joins
02:04:14jjiminez quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:27:54Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
02:30:19Arcorann (Arcorann) joins
02:32:31<systwi_>Confirmed to _not_ be the case. Non-recursive means non-recursive. Who would've thought? :-P
02:57:27sloop_ joins
02:57:27CraftByte8 (DragonSec|CraftByte) joins
02:57:39thetechrobo_ (TheTechRobo) joins
02:57:41JackThompson9 joins
02:58:28Ryz3 (Ryz) joins
02:58:30shogchips joins
02:58:40notbase2 joins
02:59:20dm4v quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
02:59:20notbasetwo quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
02:59:20duce1337 quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
02:59:20sloop quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
02:59:20ArchivalEfforts quits [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]
02:59:20Terbium quits [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]
02:59:20shoghicp quits [Excess Flood]
02:59:20cronfox quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:59:20JackThompson quits [Client Quit]
02:59:20qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Client Quit]
02:59:20JensRex quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:59:20summerisle quits [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]
02:59:20CraftByte quits [Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)]
02:59:20Jake quits [Client Quit]
02:59:20h3ndr1k quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:59:20TheTechRobo quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:59:20daxxy quits [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]
02:59:20Doranwen quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:59:20balrog quits [Client Quit]
02:59:20Iki quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:59:20treora quits [Quit: No Ping reply in 180 seconds.]
02:59:20yawkat quits [Client Quit]
02:59:21Ryz quits [Client Quit]
02:59:21BPCZ quits [Remote host closed the connection]
02:59:21JackThompson9 is now known as JackThompson
02:59:21CraftByte8 is now known as CraftByte
02:59:21Ryz3 is now known as Ryz
02:59:31dm4v joins
02:59:32BPCZ (BPCZ) joins
02:59:35Doranwen (Doranwen) joins
02:59:41balrog (balrog) joins
02:59:54ArchivalEfforts joins
03:00:00summerisle (summerisle) joins
03:00:02Terbium joins
03:00:05JensRex (JensRex) joins
03:00:05treora joins
03:00:10cronfox (Cronfox) joins
03:00:18daxxy (daxxy) joins
03:00:21h3ndr1k (h3ndr1k) joins
03:00:25yawkat (yawkat) joins
03:02:32<@JAA>systwi_: If -> represents links, never. Through page requisites, it could though. Page requisites aren't limited by wpull's --no-parent and also get retrieved on grab-site's --1.
03:03:13<systwi_>Links, yeah. hrefs.
03:03:46<systwi_>Thanks for the confirmation.
03:23:15march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
03:23:19qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins
03:23:49march_happy (march_happy) joins
03:24:28duce1337 joins
03:25:59tzt quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
03:27:18tzt (tzt) joins
03:32:33nerdguy1138 (nerdguy1138) joins
03:33:14march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
03:33:58march_happy (march_happy) joins
03:34:22nerdguy1138 quits [Remote host closed the connection]
03:34:54nerdguy1138 (nerdguy1138) joins
03:45:48march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
03:46:00march_happy (march_happy) joins
04:31:50nerdguy1138 quits [Client Quit]
04:39:56qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
04:46:44Jake (Jake) joins
04:59:54qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins
05:12:18qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Client Quit]
05:14:10qwertyasdfuiopghjkl joins
05:22:46<@OrIdow6>nerdguy1138: test ping (not actually present, see -ot)
05:23:38nerdguy1138 (nerdguy1138) joins
05:23:49<@OrIdow6>nerdguy1138: Test ping
05:23:57<nerdguy1138>Ping
05:24:00<@OrIdow6>Pong
05:24:18<nerdguy1138>Figured it out. Had the wrong channel name
05:24:23<@OrIdow6>Ah
05:24:56<nerdguy1138>Furniture reference is it possible to be logged in to the same channels with the same credentials in two places at once?
05:26:37<@JAA>You can be authenticated to the same account from multiple connections, yes.
05:27:26<nerdguy1138>And is there necessarily a command in every client which will give me a room list of everything on that network?
05:28:02<@JAA>No, rooms can be hidden from channel lists. (Most AT channels are, in fact.)
05:29:12<@JAA>But for the ones that aren't hidden, you can use /LIST normally. There's also ALIS for more intelligent querying. /msg ALIS list <pattern>
06:27:18march_happy quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
06:28:02march_happy (march_happy) joins
06:33:36march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
06:34:38march_happy (march_happy) joins
06:45:54march_happy quits [Remote host closed the connection]
06:49:10march_happy (march_happy) joins
07:23:18qwertyasdfuiopghjkl quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
07:30:04Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
07:33:17Arcorann (Arcorann) joins
08:35:51nerdguy1138 quits [Client Quit]
08:47:24march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
08:47:45march_happy (march_happy) joins
08:54:39march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
08:55:08march_happy (march_happy) joins
09:12:00march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
09:12:48march_happy (march_happy) joins
10:02:03duce1337 quits [Changing host]
10:02:03duce1337 (duce1337) joins
10:23:11Ruthalas quits [Client Quit]
10:27:27march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
10:27:45march_happy (march_happy) joins
10:32:18march_happy quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
10:32:23march_happy (march_happy) joins
10:35:16sepro quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
10:39:18march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
10:39:59march_happy (march_happy) joins
10:44:04march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
10:44:09march_happy (march_happy) joins
10:49:12march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
10:49:30march_happy (march_happy) joins
11:36:05dm4v quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
11:50:34dm4v joins
11:59:08tech_exorcist (tech_exorcist) joins
12:07:11march_happy quits [Remote host closed the connection]
12:10:53march_happy (march_happy) joins
12:21:13tech_exorcist quits [Remote host closed the connection]
12:21:51tech_exorcist (tech_exorcist) joins
12:31:21thetechrobo_ is now known as TheTechRobo
12:38:07Iki joins
12:47:33wyatt8750 quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
13:37:43shogchips quits [Remote host closed the connection]
13:38:04shoghicp (shoghicp) joins
14:08:04Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
14:19:10<Ryz>Heya folks, what would be a Firefox equivalent of Tab-Snap (a Google Chrome extension)? I'm taking another chance to use Firefox (first used Firefox, then migrated to Google Chrome, then starting to migrate back to Firefox, which kinda failed a couple of times, oof)
14:19:32<Ryz>Or at least an extension that lets me open multiple tabs after copy and pasting a list of URLs
14:20:15<Ryz>Without the extension, I can't really do my archiving activities as productively, ugh, opening 1 link at a time instead of multiple :c
14:20:31<theblazehen|m>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/open-multiple-urls/ perhaps?
14:21:09<theblazehen|m>Or just `cat list_of_urls | xargs firefox`
14:28:26<Ryz>Hmm, when using the extension, after pasting the URLs and confirming to open 'em all as a test run, the browser doesn't switch to the last link that was opened in a batch; there doesn't seem to be an option for that, oof
14:29:33<Ryz>The "Do not load tabs unless selected" feature is unique and helpful though, don't have to flood the browser with tabs when I'm just focusing on one at a time~
16:43:48datechnoman quits [Ping timeout: 255 seconds]
16:45:42datechnoman (datechnoman) joins
17:07:58michaelblob_ quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
17:09:42michaelblob (michaelblob) joins
17:52:07<systwi_>There's a website that can achieve the same result, if that also suffices.
17:52:30<@JAA>Can probably be done with a small bookmarklet as well.
17:53:20<systwi_>https://www.openurlslist.com/
18:03:35<Ryz>That's true, although the "Do not load tabs unless selected" feature is really nifty O:
19:12:14wyatt8740 joins
19:59:06<jamesp>We should focus on archiving this: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/
20:04:51<Jake>Is it going down?
20:19:14wyatt8740 quits [Client Quit]
20:19:14dm4v quits [Client Quit]
20:19:21dm4v joins
20:21:10wyatt8740 joins
21:29:47<Ryz>Heya folks, I need help figuring out how to modify how Firefox handles editing text when it comes to using the Ctrl+Arrow Keys function; basically the way Firefox does it throws me off notably when it comes to trying to manually make edits to an ignore I usually dish out in ArchiveBot, whereas Google Chrome handles it more finely
21:34:08<Ryz>Basically I want Firefox to mimic or replicate how Google Chrome handles it entirely~
21:44:17tech_exorcist quits [Client Quit]
21:46:31<Ryz>Here's an example image, https://transfer.archivete.am/41kqJ/Ctrl_plus_Arrow_Keys_text_edit_navigation%2C_Google_Chrome_vs._Firefox.png - the top example is Google Chrome; the bottom example is Firefox; as you can see, the top example has more lines but is more flexible, whereas the bottom example is the opposite for me
21:47:12<Ryz>What is baffling is that for the Firefox example, if I move from the first yellow line to the right, it skips the second line and goes to the third, and the opposite is not true~
21:47:34<@JAA>Non-download: https://transfer.archivete.am/inline/41kqJ/Ctrl_plus_Arrow_Keys_text_edit_navigation%2C_Google_Chrome_vs._Firefox.png
21:49:31<@JAA>There are a few hidden options in about:config, but I'm not sure you can get it to do what you want exactly.
21:49:54<@JAA>layout.word_select.* to be precise.
21:50:45<Ryz>I consider this to be a big holdover from me being able to transition cleanly from Google Chrome to Firefox just because of this particular way it's handled if I cannot get it to what I am accustomed to~
21:50:47<Ryz>Hmm...
21:51:25<@JAA>There are going to be tiny differences like this. Improvise, adapt, overcome... ;-)
21:55:35<Ryz>If I have to let go of the Control key in order to get more precision when editing up ignores, I consider that too much friction
22:12:10<Ryz>If Firefox is supposed to be more flexible than Google Chrome, it would be fair to say there should be a way to change it; I managed to tweak a bunch of stuff from the default Firefox that would be tailored to my workflow~ Besides a certain extension, this is legit the only one left that's holding me back from a full and proper transition for me
22:19:24<Ryz>By the way, I did try tweaking with the setting A> layout.word_select.* - it didn't work s:
22:21:11<thuban>welcome to the club. i've had a bug report open for four years because qt's word boundary detection is, rather than the unicode specification behavior or even a regex-style character-class assertion, a hard-coded list :) https://github.com/qt/qtbase/blob/dev/src/gui/text/qtextengine.cpp#L2777
23:06:38nerdguy1138 (nerdguy1138) joins
23:10:49march_happy quits [Remote host closed the connection]
23:14:03march_happy (march_happy) joins
23:19:19BlueMaxima joins
23:24:14<Ryz>Yikes, long standing bugs just...not fixed huh thuban :c
23:39:40michaelblob quits [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
23:54:37march_happy quits [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
23:55:12<@JAA>In general, I do think that Firefox is more flexible and customisable. This is just a very, *very* specific thing.
23:55:14march_happy (march_happy) joins
23:56:14<@JAA>I assume you could in theory hack it in. The relevant file seems to be https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/intl/lwbrk/WordBreaker.cpp . But good luck building the damn thing and maintaining that in the future.

HomeSearchPrevious dayNext day