| 00:16:43 | | m0nika quits [Quit: Zzz] |
| 00:18:03 | | m0nika (m0nika) joins |
| 00:27:46 | | Arcorann (Arcorann) joins |
| 00:28:21 | | godane joins |
| 00:28:21 | | godane is now authenticated as godane |
| 00:29:18 | | godane1 quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 00:31:44 | | nostalgebraist quits [Client Quit] |
| 00:37:50 | | BlueMaxima joins |
| 01:02:44 | | dm4v_ joins |
| 01:04:05 | | dm4v quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 01:04:05 | | dm4v_ is now known as dm4v |
| 01:04:05 | | dm4v is now authenticated as dm4v |
| 01:04:05 | | dm4v quits [Changing host] |
| 01:04:05 | | dm4v (dm4v) joins |
| 01:26:45 | | AlsoHP_Archivist joins |
| 02:02:16 | | driib8 (driib) joins |
| 02:04:16 | | driib quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 02:04:16 | | driib8 is now known as driib |
| 02:38:52 | | ThreeHM quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 02:40:39 | | ThreeHM (ThreeHeadedMonkey) joins |
| 02:58:39 | | DogsRNice quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
| 02:58:42 | | Viniter quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 03:11:46 | | qw3rty__ joins |
| 03:12:05 | | HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 03:12:37 | | HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins |
| 03:14:51 | | HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 03:15:16 | | qw3rty_ quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 03:15:17 | | HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins |
| 03:22:15 | | HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 03:25:03 | | HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins |
| 04:04:08 | | DopefishJustin quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 04:08:34 | | DopefishJustin joins |
| 04:08:34 | | DopefishJustin is now authenticated as DopefishJustin |
| 04:11:49 | <@OrIdow6> | So thinking about all the close calls and close misses, I wonder if it's possible to have something that scans sites and looks for shutdown notice |
| 04:12:20 | <@OrIdow6> | Have some big regex to look for notices, and scan each page in a list once a day, or something like that |
| 04:12:28 | | Viniter (Viniter) joins |
| 04:17:43 | <@JAA> | That probably wouldn't work very well, but something I've had in my head for a long time is a system that scrapes search engines, social media, etc. for relevant terms. I did that manually every couple weeks for a while some years back, but it becomes exhausting very, very quickly. A more sensible approach would probably be to feed into an issue tracker for result management with some basic dedupe. |
| 04:18:20 | <@JAA> | Search examples: 'website closing', 'website "shutting down"', etc. |
| 04:24:37 | <@OrIdow6> | Yes, search engines and social media would help a lot as well; why don't you think a direct check wouldn't work well? Just a low success rate |
| 04:24:55 | <@OrIdow6> | Issue tracker might be useful even without automation |
| 04:25:18 | <@OrIdow6> | Though the wiki does well enough for that, I suppose |
| 04:25:34 | <@OrIdow6> | *rate? |
| 04:26:43 | <@JAA> | Well, for a start, we'd need a big list of websites to check. And that list would have to be kept up-to-date. It's hard (or rather, expensive) enough to get lists of domains, but sometimes a domain hosts multiple websites etc. |
| 04:27:22 | <@JAA> | And the regex would probably be horrible. lol |
| 04:28:06 | <@JAA> | Yeah, I've been thinking recently that an issue tracker might help replace Deathwatch somewhat. Due date, assign to someone, brief status updates without creating a full wiki page, etc. Not sure though. |
| 04:42:54 | <@JAA> | But on the other hand, duplicating information isn't useful nor is splitting it up. So probably not that great an idea. |
| 04:45:28 | <@OrIdow6> | Yes, the regex was a bad idea |
| 04:46:30 | <@OrIdow6> | I can see an issue tracker as being useful for small-to-medium sites |
| 04:47:18 | <tech234a> | On a related note it might make sense to make a change notifier for the Google Support website... it might pick up some shutdown notices for Google products |
| 04:47:21 | <@OrIdow6> | Or perhaps just medium - too small to go on Deathwatch, too big to get done in 5 minutes |
| 04:47:50 | <@JAA> | I'd more see it as useful for keeping track at a glance of what needs to be worked on at what priority and who's leading each effort. |
| 04:48:24 | <@JAA> | But it has the potential of leading to wiki neglect and partially moving discussion away from IRC. |
| 04:48:32 | <@OrIdow6> | tech234a: IIRC someone pointed out that Yahoo Answers disappeared from their product page before the shutdown announcement, so something like that could work |
| 04:48:36 | <@OrIdow6> | More generally |
| 04:49:17 | <thuban> | find some way to make deathwatch transclude information from an issue tracker like ted nelson intended |
| 04:49:39 | <@JAA> | Well, Semantic MediaWiki is a thing. |
| 04:49:51 | <@OrIdow6> | Best solution if you had an issue tracker could just be to chastise people for talking too much about non-issue-tracking related stuff on it, as people are shooed out of #archiveteam |
| 04:50:40 | <@JAA> | (And other similar things as well, since SMW might be ridiculously overpowered for this.) |
| 04:51:46 | <thuban> | color me intrigued |
| 04:53:41 | <tech234a> | Yeah I was the one who noticed that Yahoo Answers was removed from the product list before the shutdown :) |
| 04:54:11 | <tech234a> | But yeah some kind of changelogger for various sites would be nice |
| 04:55:21 | <@JAA> | Good luck with that. |
| 04:56:29 | <tech234a> | Yeah HTML can be messy |
| 04:56:37 | <tech234a> | And vary on page load |
| 04:58:07 | <@JAA> | Basically, we'd want to slightly expand the infobox project with a deadline date and priority and then have a sortable and filterable index over the fields there, I think? Plus we'd need some way to collect smaller things that don't need a full wiki page. |
| 04:59:39 | <@OrIdow6> | Small enough a task that it could be doable with a bot |
| 05:00:21 | <@JAA> | I suppose the smaller ones could simply go on one page (like Deathwatch now) with a bunch of infoboxes or a more minimal version of it. |
| 05:00:22 | <@OrIdow6> | That's also more flexible if you want to be able to create entires on either end |
| 05:00:45 | <@OrIdow6> | That owuld work |
| 05:00:50 | <@JAA> | This actually sounds like a fun little project. |
| 05:01:12 | <@JAA> | Then just keep the index updated with Special:RecentChanges and all is well. |
| 05:02:14 | <@JAA> | I've been meaning to overhaul the infobox for a long time anyway. |
| 05:03:43 | <@JAA> | The wiki would remain the single source of truth and go-to place for information about upcoming shutdowns. The index would just make browsing and keeping an overview a bit simpler (and could live on the wiki or externally). |
| 05:04:29 | <@JAA> | Well, I'm off to bed now, but I'll think about this some more tomorrow. :-) |
| 05:06:48 | <Ryz> | It makes me wonder what's the most urgent thing that when addressed, would improve ArchiveTeam~ ><; |
| 05:07:16 | <Ryz> | It can be a bit hard to tell with so much activity spread out~ |
| 05:13:34 | | HackMii quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 05:13:54 | | HackMii (hacktheplanet) joins |
| 05:45:04 | | AlsoHP_Archivist quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 06:43:56 | | beej (beej) joins |
| 07:03:13 | | AlsoHP_Archivist joins |
| 07:40:27 | | lennier1 quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 07:40:49 | | lennier1 (lennier1) joins |
| 08:04:56 | | spirit joins |
| 08:21:51 | | AlsoHP_Archivist quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 08:53:13 | | Viniter1 (Viniter) joins |
| 08:53:16 | | Viniter quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 08:53:16 | | Viniter1 is now known as Viniter |
| 08:58:34 | | spirit quits [Client Quit] |
| 09:17:29 | | BlueMaxima quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
| 10:58:41 | | beej quits [Client Quit] |
| 11:30:50 | | user777 quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 12:12:36 | | godane quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 13:54:27 | | Deewiant (Deewiant) joins |
| 15:28:31 | | themadpro (themadpro) joins |
| 16:12:58 | | Arcorann quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 16:27:15 | | sverre26 quits [Remote host closed the connection] |
| 16:45:10 | | luckcolors quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 18:07:51 | | themadpro quits [Client Quit] |
| 18:10:30 | | beej joins |
| 18:11:09 | | beej is now authenticated as beej |
| 18:45:38 | | lukash7 quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 18:49:59 | | AlsoHP_Archivist joins |
| 18:51:18 | | lukash7 joins |
| 18:59:30 | | Wayward quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 19:02:21 | | AlsoHP_Archivist quits [Read error: Connection reset by peer] |
| 19:02:47 | | AlsoHP_Archivist joins |
| 19:10:20 | | rewby quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 19:12:04 | | DogsRNice (Webuser299) joins |
| 20:20:12 | | beej quits [Client Quit] |
| 21:22:09 | | Sylirana quits [Ping timeout: 244 seconds] |
| 21:22:59 | | Sylirana (Sylirana) joins |
| 21:33:24 | | BlueMaxima joins |
| 21:53:43 | | britm0b joins |
| 21:53:45 | | britmob quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 21:58:32 | | rewby (rewby) joins |
| 22:08:50 | | rewby quits [Client Quit] |
| 22:09:24 | | rewby (rewby) joins |
| 22:39:12 | | Matthww quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |
| 22:45:04 | | Matthww joins |
| 22:49:50 | | Matthww quits [Client Quit] |
| 22:50:10 | | Matthww joins |
| 23:04:24 | | britmob joins |
| 23:06:58 | | britm0b quits [Ping timeout: 258 seconds] |
| 23:17:54 | | AlsoHP_Archivist quits [Client Quit] |
| 23:23:24 | | superkuh quits [Ping timeout: 250 seconds] |